Back

Molecular characterization of bacterial communities in sheep cheese through 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Endres, C. M.; de Castro, I. M. S.; Trevisol, L. D.; Mann, M. B.; Varela, A. P. M.; Frazzon, A. P. G.; Meyer, F. Q.; Frazzon, J.

2019-08-30 microbiology
10.1101/753053 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The production of sheeps milk cheese has grown in recent years since it is a high value-added product with excellent properties. As such, it is necessary to provide data on the microbiota and organoleptic characteristics of this product, as well as the influence of these microorganisms on public health. Thus, the aim of the present study was to characterize the microbial community of different types of sheep cheeses using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The study was conducted with four groups of cheese: colonial, fresh, feta, and pecorino (n = 5 samples per group). The high-throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing revealed 55 operational taxonomic units in the 20 samples, representing 9 genera of the two bacterial phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The predominant genera in the samples were Streptococcus and Lactobacillus. When evaluating alpha diversity by the indexes of Simpson, Chao1, Shannon, and Skew no significant differences were observed between the groups. Evaluating of the beta diversity using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, the group of colonial cheeses presented a significant difference when compared to the feta (q = 0.030) and pecorino groups (q = 0.030). Additionally, the fresh group differed from the pecorino group (q = 0.030). The unweighted Unifrac distance suggests that the colonial cheese group differed from the others. Moreover, the feta cheese group differed from the fresh group. The distance-weighted Unifrac suggests that no significance exists between the groups. According to this information, the microbiota characterization of these cheese groups was useful in demonstrating the bacterial communities belonging to each group, its effects on processing, elaboration, maturation, and public health.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.5%
2
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.1%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
9
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
15
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
17
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%