Back

Multiple separate cases of pseudogenized meiosis genes Msh4 and Msh5 in Eurotiomycete fungi: associations with Zip3 sequence evolution and homothallism, but not Pch2 losses

Savelkoul, E.; Toll, C. D.; Benassi, N. D.; Logsdon, J. M.

2019-08-31 genetics
10.1101/750497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The overall process of meiosis is conserved in many species, including some lineages that have lost various ancestrally present meiosis genes. The extent to which individual meiosis gene losses are independent from or dependent on one another is largely unknown. Various Eurotiomycete fungi were investigated as a case system of recent meiosis gene losses after BLAST and synteny comparisons found Msh4, Msh5, Pch2, and Zip3 to be either pseudogenized or undetected in Aspergillus nidulans yet intact in congeners such as A. fumigatus. Flanking gene-targeted degenerate PCR primers applied to 9 additional Aspergillus species found (i) Msh4, Msh5, and Zip3 pseudogenized in A. rugulosus (sister taxon to A. nidulans) but intact in all other amplified sequences; and (ii) Pch2 not present at the syntenic locus in most of the 9 species. Topology tests suggested two independent Pch2 losses in genus Aspergillus, neither directly coinciding with pseudogenization of the other three genes. The A. nidulans-A. conjunctus clade Pch2 loss was not associated with significant Ka/Ks changes for Msh4, Msh5, or Zip3; this suggests against prior Pch2 loss directly altering sequence evolution constraints on these three genes. By contrast, Zip3 Ka/Ks tended to be elevated in several other Eurotiomycete fungi with independently pseudogenized Msh4 and Msh5 (Talaromyces stipitatus, Eurotium herbariorum). The coinciding Ka/Ks elevation and/or clear pseudogenization of Zip3 in taxa with pseudogenized Msh4 and Msh5 is consistent with some degree of molecular coevolution. Possible molecular, environmental, and life history variables (e.g., homothallism) that may be associated with these numerous independent meiosis gene losses (Msh4: 3, Msh5: 3, Zip3: [≥] 1, Pch2: 4) are discussed.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.8%
4
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
6
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
7
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
11
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Yeast
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
26
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
28
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%