Back

Multiple separate cases of pseudogenized meiosis genes Msh4 and Msh5 in Eurotiomycete fungi: associations with Zip3 sequence evolution and homothallism, but not Pch2 losses

Savelkoul, E.; Toll, C. D.; Benassi, N. D.; Logsdon, J. M.

2019-08-31 genetics
10.1101/750497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The overall process of meiosis is conserved in many species, including some lineages that have lost various ancestrally present meiosis genes. The extent to which individual meiosis gene losses are independent from or dependent on one another is largely unknown. Various Eurotiomycete fungi were investigated as a case system of recent meiosis gene losses after BLAST and synteny comparisons found Msh4, Msh5, Pch2, and Zip3 to be either pseudogenized or undetected in Aspergillus nidulans yet intact in congeners such as A. fumigatus. Flanking gene-targeted degenerate PCR primers applied to 9 additional Aspergillus species found (i) Msh4, Msh5, and Zip3 pseudogenized in A. rugulosus (sister taxon to A. nidulans) but intact in all other amplified sequences; and (ii) Pch2 not present at the syntenic locus in most of the 9 species. Topology tests suggested two independent Pch2 losses in genus Aspergillus, neither directly coinciding with pseudogenization of the other three genes. The A. nidulans-A. conjunctus clade Pch2 loss was not associated with significant Ka/Ks changes for Msh4, Msh5, or Zip3; this suggests against prior Pch2 loss directly altering sequence evolution constraints on these three genes. By contrast, Zip3 Ka/Ks tended to be elevated in several other Eurotiomycete fungi with independently pseudogenized Msh4 and Msh5 (Talaromyces stipitatus, Eurotium herbariorum). The coinciding Ka/Ks elevation and/or clear pseudogenization of Zip3 in taxa with pseudogenized Msh4 and Msh5 is consistent with some degree of molecular coevolution. Possible molecular, environmental, and life history variables (e.g., homothallism) that may be associated with these numerous independent meiosis gene losses (Msh4: 3, Msh5: 3, Zip3: [≥] 1, Pch2: 4) are discussed.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
5
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
6
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
8
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
12
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Yeast
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
23
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
27
Chromosome Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
28
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%