Polygenic Prediction of Substance Use Disorders in Clinical and Population Samples
Barr, P. B.; Ksinan, A.; Su, J.; Johnson, E. C.; Meyers, J. L.; Wetherill, L.; Latvala, A.; Aleive, F.; Chan, G.; Kuperman, S.; Nurnberger, J.; Kamarajan, C.; Anokhin, A.; Agrawal, A.; Rose, R. J.; Edenberg, H. J.; Schuckit, M.; Kaprio, J.; Dick, D. M.
Show abstract
Genome-wide, polygenic risk scores (PRS) have emerged as a useful way to characterize genetic liability using genotypic data. There is growing evidence that PRS may prove useful to identify those at increased risk for developing certain diseases. The current utility of PRS in relation to alcohol use disorders (AUD) remains an open question. Using data from both a population-based sample [the FinnTwin12 (FT12) study] and a high risk sample [the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA)], we examined the association between PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of 1) alcohol dependence/alcohol problems, 2) alcohol consumption, and 3) risky behaviors with AUD and other substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms. Individuals in the top 20%, 10%, and 5% of PRSs had increasingly greater odds of having an AUD compared to the lower end of the continuum in both COGA (80th % OR = 1.95; 90th % OR = 2.03; 95th % OR = 2.13) and FT12 (80th % OR = 1.77; 90th % OR = 2.27; 95th % OR = 2.39). Those in the top 5% reported greater levels of licit (alcohol and nicotine) and illicit (cannabis) SUD symptoms. PRSs can predict elevated risk for SUD in independent samples. However, clinical utility of these scores in their current form is modest. As these scores become more predictive of SUD, they may become useful to practitioners. Improvement in predictive ability will likely be dependent on increasing the size of well-phenotyped discovery samples.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Heterogeneity Across Dimensions of Alcohol Use Behaviors 95%
- Multivariate GWAS elucidates the genetic architecture of alcohol consumption and misuse, corrects biases, and reveals novel associations with disease 95%
- Genetic underpinnings of the transition from alcohol consumption to alcohol use disorder: shared and unique genetic architectures in a cross-ancestry sample 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurogenetic and multi-omic sources of overlap among sensation seeking, alcohol consumption, and alcohol use disorder 97%
- Genetic liability for substance use associated with medical comorbidities in electronic health records of African- and European-ancestry individuals 96%
- A Multivariate Approach to Understanding the Genetic Overlap between Externalizing Phenotypes and Substance Use Disorders 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Substance Use Disorders: A Multifactorial Risk Index Combining Clinical, Environmental, and Genetic Risk Factors 98%
- Educational attainment causally impacts drinking behaviors and risk for alcohol dependence: results from a two-sample Mendelian randomization study in ~ 780,000 study participants 95%
- Leveraging genome-wide data to investigate differences between opioid use vs. opioid dependence in 41,176 individuals from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population 94%
- Polygenic scores for tobacco use provide insights into systemic health risks in a diverse EHR-linked biobank in Los Angeles 94%
- Genomic Influences on Self-Reported Childhood Maltreatment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel insights into the common heritable liability to addiction: a multivariate genome-wide association study 96%
- Altered neurobehavioral reward response predicts psychotic-like experiences in youth exposed to cannabis prenatally 93%
- Exome chip meta-analysis elucidates the genetic architecture of rare coding variants in smoking and drinking behavior 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.