A psychometric evaluation of the 12-item EPQ-R neuroticism scale in 384,183 UK Biobank participants using item response theory (IRT)
Bauermeister, S.; Gallacher, J. E. J.
Show abstract
Neuroticism has been described as a broad and pervasive personality dimension or heterogeneous trait measuring components of mood instability, such as worry; anxiety; irritability; moodiness; self-consciousness and sadness. Consistent with depression and anxiety-related disorders, increased neuroticism places an individual vulnerable for other unipolar and bipolar mood disorders and therefore highly relevant in epidemiologic research. However, the measurement of neuroticism remains a challenge. We aimed to adapt the 12-item Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised Neuroticism (EPQ-RN) scale for use in epidemiologic studies by identifying psychometrically efficient items using item response theory. The 12-item EPQ-RN scale was evaluated by estimating an IRT model on data from 401,527 UK Biobank participants aged 39 to 73 years (M = 56.41 years; SD = 8.06), 53.68% female. The IRT model yielded two item characteristics: item discrimination, an indicator of how well an item differentiates between respondents, and item difficulty, an indicator of the amount of the latent construct (neuroticism) needed to endorse an item. The EPQ-RN exhibited psychometric inefficiency with poor discrimination at extremes of the scale range. High and low scores are relatively poorly represented and uninformative suggesting that high neuroticism scores derived from the scale are a function of cumulative mid-range values. Following systematic item deletion, a 3-item scale was found to have high levels of discrimination, but offered a narrow range of difficulty i.e. was not sensitive to low levels of neuroticism. A 7-item scale was found to be most informative; providing high levels of discrimination across the range of neuroticism scores.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 94%
- Fear among Syrians: a Proposed Cutoff Score and Validation of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale- A National Survey 93%
- Mental health and burnout during medical school: Longitudinal evolution and covariates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of the Alimetry(R) Gut-Brain Wellbeing Survey: A novel patient-reported mental health scale for patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms 93%
- Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire 93%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 93%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Psychological and social impact of COVID-19 in Pakistan: Need for Gender Responsive Policies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A psychometric validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in community-dwelling older adults 94%
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 91%
- Pilot study of a ketogenic diet in bipolar disorder: a process evaluation 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Adaptation During A Crisis: Decline in Anxiety and Depression After the Initial Weeks of COVID-19 in the United States 90%
- Contactless Depression Screening via Facial Video-derived Heart Rate Variability 90%
- Early identification of postpartum depression using demographic, clinical, and digital phenotyping 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.