Back

A psychometric evaluation of the 12-item EPQ-R neuroticism scale in 384,183 UK Biobank participants using item response theory (IRT)

Bauermeister, S.; Gallacher, J. E. J.

2019-08-21 neuroscience
10.1101/741249 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neuroticism has been described as a broad and pervasive personality dimension or heterogeneous trait measuring components of mood instability, such as worry; anxiety; irritability; moodiness; self-consciousness and sadness. Consistent with depression and anxiety-related disorders, increased neuroticism places an individual vulnerable for other unipolar and bipolar mood disorders and therefore highly relevant in epidemiologic research. However, the measurement of neuroticism remains a challenge. We aimed to adapt the 12-item Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised Neuroticism (EPQ-RN) scale for use in epidemiologic studies by identifying psychometrically efficient items using item response theory. The 12-item EPQ-RN scale was evaluated by estimating an IRT model on data from 401,527 UK Biobank participants aged 39 to 73 years (M = 56.41 years; SD = 8.06), 53.68% female. The IRT model yielded two item characteristics: item discrimination, an indicator of how well an item differentiates between respondents, and item difficulty, an indicator of the amount of the latent construct (neuroticism) needed to endorse an item. The EPQ-RN exhibited psychometric inefficiency with poor discrimination at extremes of the scale range. High and low scores are relatively poorly represented and uninformative suggesting that high neuroticism scores derived from the scale are a function of cumulative mid-range values. Following systematic item deletion, a 3-item scale was found to have high levels of discrimination, but offered a narrow range of difficulty i.e. was not sensitive to low levels of neuroticism. A 7-item scale was found to be most informative; providing high levels of discrimination across the range of neuroticism scores.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
6
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
7
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
8
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
14
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
15
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
17
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%