Back

Considering founding and variable genomes is critical in studying polyploid evolution

Ye, X.; Hu, H.; Zhou, H.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, S.; Yuan, Z.; Stiller, J.; Li, C.; Chen, G.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, C.

2019-08-16 evolutionary biology
10.1101/738229 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A wide range of differences between the subgenomes, termed as subgenome asymmetry or SA, has been reported in various polyploids and different species seem to have different responses to polyploidization. We compared subgenome differences in gene ratio and relative diversity between artificial and natural genotypes of several allopolyploid species. Surprisingly, consistent differences in neither gene ratio nor relative diversity between the subgenomes were detected between these two types of polyploid genotypes although they differ in times exposed to evolutional selection. As expected, the estimated ratio of retained genes between a subgenome and its diploid donor was invariably higher for the artificial allopolyploid genotypes due likely to the presence of variable genome components (VGC). Clearly, the presence of VGC means that exaggerated differences between a donor and a subgenome in a polyploid are inevitable when random genotypes were used to represent species of either a polyploid or its donors. SA was also detected in genotypes before the completion of the polyploidization events as well as in those which were not formed via polyploidization. Considering that significant changes during and following polyploidization have been detected in previous studies, our results suggest that the influence of VGC needs to be considered in evaluating SA and that diploid donors may define changes in polyploid evolution.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
21
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Chromosome Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
28
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%