Back

An integrated population model for estimating the relative effects of natural and anthropogenic factors on a threatened population of Pacific trout

Scheuerell, M. D.; Ruff, C. P.; Anderson, J. H.; Beamer, E. M.

2019-08-15 ecology
10.1101/734996 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIAssessing the degree to which at-risk species are regulated by density dependent versus density independent factors is often complicated by incomplete or biased information. If not addressed in an appropriate manner, errors in the data can affect estimates of population demographics, which may obfuscate the anticipated response of the population to a specific action.\nC_LIO_LIWe developed a Bayesian integrated population model that accounts explicitly for interannual variability in the number of reproducing adults and their age structure, harvest, and environmental conditions. We apply the model to 41 years of data for a population of threatened steelhead trout Oncorhynchus mykiss using freshwater flows, ocean indices, and releases of hatchery-born conspecifics as covariates.\nC_LIO_LIWe found compelling evidence that the population is under strong density dependence, despite being well below its historical population size. In the freshwater portion of the lifecycle, we found a negative relationship between productivity (offspring per parent) and peak winter flows, and a positive relationship with summer flows. We also found a negative relationship between productivity and releases of hatchery conspecifics. In the marine portion of the lifecycle, we found a positive correlation between productivity and the North Pacific Gyre Oscillation. Furthermore, harvest rates on wild fish have been sufficiently low to ensure very little risk of overfishing.\nC_LIO_LISynthesis and applications. The evidence for density dependent population regulation, combined with the substantial loss of juvenile rearing habitat in this river basin, suggests that habitat restoration could benefit this population of at-risk steelhead. Our results also imply that hatchery programs for steelhead need to be considered carefully with respect to habitat availability and recovery goals for wild steelhead. If releases of hatchery steelhead have indeed limited the production potential of wild steelhead, there are likely significant tradeoffs between providing harvest opportunities via hatchery steelhead production, and achieving wild steelhead recovery goals.\nC_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
5
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
7
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
11
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
12
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
16
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%