Back

Modeling individual disability evolution in multiple sclerosis patients based on longitudinal multimodal imaging and clinical data

Tozlu, C.; Sappey-Marinier, D.; Kocevar, G.; Cotton, F.; Vukusic, S.; Durand-Dubief, F.; Maucort-Boulch, D.

2019-08-19 neuroscience
10.1101/733295 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe individual disease evolution of multiple sclerosis (MS) is very different from one patient to another. Therefore, the prediction of long-term disability evolution is difficult based on only clinical information. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a very efficient tool to distinguish between healthy and abnormal brain tissue, monitor disease evolution, and help decision-making for personalized treatment of MS patients.\n\nObjectiveWe aim to develop a patient-specific model to predict individual disease evolution in MS, using demographic, clinical, and imaging data that were collected at study onset.\n\nMethodsThe study included 75 patients tracked over 5 years. The latent class linear mixed model was used to consider individual and unobserved subgroup variability. First, the clinical model was established with demographic and clinical variables to predict clinical disease evolution. Second, the imaging model was built using the multimodal imaging variables. Third, the imaging variables were added one by one, two by two, and all three together to investigate their contribution to the clinical model. The clinical disability is measured with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The performances of the clinical, imaging, and the combined models were compared mainly using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The mean of the posterior probabilities was also given as the secondary performance evaluation criterion.\n\nResultsThe clinical model gave higher BIC value than imaging and any combined models. The means of the posterior probabilities given by the three models were over 0.94. The clinical model clustered the patients into two latent classes: stable evolution class (n=6, 88%) and severe evolution class (n=9, 12%).\n\nConclusionThe latent class linear mixed model may provide a well-fitted prediction for the disability evolution in MS patients, thus giving further information for personalized treatment decisions after thorough validation with a larger and independent dataset.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
5
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
6
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
8
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
10
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
12
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Molecular Brain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%