Modeling individual disability evolution in multiple sclerosis patients based on longitudinal multimodal imaging and clinical data
Tozlu, C.; Sappey-Marinier, D.; Kocevar, G.; Cotton, F.; Vukusic, S.; Durand-Dubief, F.; Maucort-Boulch, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe individual disease evolution of multiple sclerosis (MS) is very different from one patient to another. Therefore, the prediction of long-term disability evolution is difficult based on only clinical information. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a very efficient tool to distinguish between healthy and abnormal brain tissue, monitor disease evolution, and help decision-making for personalized treatment of MS patients.\n\nObjectiveWe aim to develop a patient-specific model to predict individual disease evolution in MS, using demographic, clinical, and imaging data that were collected at study onset.\n\nMethodsThe study included 75 patients tracked over 5 years. The latent class linear mixed model was used to consider individual and unobserved subgroup variability. First, the clinical model was established with demographic and clinical variables to predict clinical disease evolution. Second, the imaging model was built using the multimodal imaging variables. Third, the imaging variables were added one by one, two by two, and all three together to investigate their contribution to the clinical model. The clinical disability is measured with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The performances of the clinical, imaging, and the combined models were compared mainly using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The mean of the posterior probabilities was also given as the secondary performance evaluation criterion.\n\nResultsThe clinical model gave higher BIC value than imaging and any combined models. The means of the posterior probabilities given by the three models were over 0.94. The clinical model clustered the patients into two latent classes: stable evolution class (n=6, 88%) and severe evolution class (n=9, 12%).\n\nConclusionThe latent class linear mixed model may provide a well-fitted prediction for the disability evolution in MS patients, thus giving further information for personalized treatment decisions after thorough validation with a larger and independent dataset.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain predictors of fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a machine learning study 94%
- Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 93%
- A prospective, observational study on conversion of Clinically Isolated Syndrome to Multiple Sclerosis during 4-year period (MS NEO study) in Taiwan 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The progressive loss of brain network fingerprints in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis predicts clinical impairment 94%
- A tractometry investigation of white matter tract network structure and relationships with cognitive function in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis 93%
- Imaging cortical multiple sclerosis lesions with ultra-high field MRI 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glymphatic dysfunction in multiple sclerosis and its association with disease pathology and disability 94%
- Tissue damage detected by quantitative gradient echo MRI correlates with clinical progression in non-relapsing progressive MS 94%
- Paramagnetic rim lesions are associated with pathogenic CSF profiles and worse clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current status and future opportunities in modeling Multiple Sclerosis clinical characteristics 95%
- LesionQuant for assessment of MRI in multiple sclerosis - a promising supplement to the visual scan inspection 92%
- Alpha-Linolenic Acid Associations with Disability and Brain Volume in Multiple Sclerosis: A Brief Replication Report 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.