Back

Using QSAR for predictions in drug delivery

Rivera-Delgado, E.; Xin, A.; von Recum, H.

2019-08-06 bioengineering
10.1101/727172 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drug delivery research is an inherently empirical process, however high-throughput approaches could take advantage of understanding drug/material interactions such as from electrostatic, hydrophobic, or other non-covalent interactions between therapeutic molecules and a drug delivery polymer. Cyclodextrin polymers have been investigated for drug delivery specifically due to their capacity to exploit this affinity interaction to change the rate of drug release. Testing drug candidates; however, for affinity is time-consuming, making computational predictions more effective. One option, molecular \"docking\" programs, provide predictions of affinity, but lack reliability, as their accuracy with cyclodextrin remains unverified experimentally. Alternatively, quantitative structure-activity relationship models (QSARs), which analyze statistical relationships between molecular properties, appear more promising. Previously constructed QSARs for cyclodextrin are not publicly available, necessitating an openly accessible model. Around 600 experimental affinities between cyclodextrin and guest molecules were cleaned and imported from published research. The software PaDEL-Descriptor calculated over 1000 chemical descriptors for each molecule, which were then analyzed in R to create several QSARs with different statistical methods. These QSARs proved highly time efficient, calculating in minutes what docking programs would take hours to accomplish. Additionally, on test sets, QSARs reached R2 values of around 0.7-0.8. The speed, accuracy, and accessibility of these QSARs improve evaluation of individual drugs and facilitate screening of large datasets for potential candidates in cyclodextrin affinity-based delivery systems. An app was built to rapidly access model predictions for end users using the \"shiny\" library in R. To demonstrate the usability for drug release planning, the QSAR predictions were coupled with a mechanistic model of diffusion within the app. Integrating new modules should provide an accessible approach to use other cheminformatic tools in the field of drug delivery.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.4%
3
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
ChemMedChem
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
23
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
30
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%