Back

Bayesian modelling to assess differential expression from single-cell data

Godinho, J.; Carvalho, A.; Vinga, S.

2019-07-30 bioinformatics
10.1101/719856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Disease profiling, treatment development, and the identification of new cell populations are some of the most relevant applications relying on differentially expressed genes (DEG) analysis. In this context, three leading technologies emerged; namely, DNA microarrays, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), the main focus of this work. Although scRNA-seq tends to offer more accurate data, it is still limited by many confounding factors. We introduce two novel approaches to assess DEG: extended Bayesian zero-inflated negative binomial factorization (ext-ZINBayes) and single-cell differential analysis (SIENA). In addition, we benchmark the proposed methods with known DEG analysis tools for single-cell and bulk RNA data, using two real public datasets. One contains house mouse cells of two different types, while the other gathers human peripheral blood mononuclear cells divided into four types. The results show that the two procedures can be very competitive with existing methods (scVI, SCDE, MAST, and DEseq) in identifying relevant putative biomarkers. In terms of scalability and correctness, SIENA stands out from ext-ZINBayes and some of the existing methods. As single-cell datasets become increasingly larger, SIENA may emerge as a powerful tool to discover functional differences between two conditions. Both methods are publicly available (https://github.com/JoanaGodinho/SIENA, https://github.com/JoanaGodinho/ext-ZINBayes).

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.