Back

Dark diversity reveals importance of biotic resources and competition for plant diversity across broad environmental gradients

Flojgaard, C.; Valdez, J.; Dalby, L.; Moeslund, J. E.; Clausen, K. K.; Ejrnaes, R.; Partel, M.; Brunbjerg, A. K.

2019-06-27 ecology
10.1101/685040 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Species richness is the most commonly used metric to quantify biodiversity. However, examining dark diversity, the group of missing species which can potentially inhabit a site, can provide a more thorough understanding of the processes influencing observed biodiversity and help evaluate the restoration potential of local habitats. So far, dark diversity has mainly been studied for specific habitats or largescale landscapes while less attention has been given to variation across broad environmental gradients or as a result of local conditions and biotic interactions. In this study, we investigate the importance of local environmental conditions in determining dark diversity and observed richness in plant communities across broad environmental gradients. We use the ecospace concept to investigate how abiotic gradients (defined as position), availability of biotic resources (defined as expansion), spatiotemporal extent of habitats (defined as continuity), as well as species interactions through competition, relate to these biodiversity measures. Position variables were important for both plant richness and dark diversity, some with quadratic relationships, e.g., plant richness showing a unimodal response to soil fertility corresponding to the intermediate productivity hypothesis. Competition represented by community mean Grime C showed a negative correlation with plant richness. Besides position, organic carbon was the most important variable for dark diversity, indicating that in late succession habitats such as forests and shrubs, dark diversity is generally low. The importance of Grime C indicate that intermediate disturbance, such as grazing, may facilitate higher species richness and lower dark diversity. Comparing various biodiversity metrics and their influencing factors might reveal important drivers of biodiversity changes and result in better conservation decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.2%
3
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
7
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
12
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
14
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
15
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
16
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
18
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
24
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%