Back

Intraspecific population admixture of a top piscivore correlates with anthropogenic alteration of freshwater ecosystems

Eschbach, E.; Nolte, A. W.; Kohlmann, K.; Alos, J.; Schoening, S.; Arlinghaus, R.

2019-07-02 evolutionary biology
10.1101/677856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conservation of local genetic diversity is an important policy objective, but intraspecific genetic diversity can be transformed by natural ecological processes associated with anthropogenic changes in ecosystems. Environmental changes and a strong interconnection of drainage systems impact freshwater biodiversity from gene to population level. Populations can either become extinct or expand their range and accompanying secondary contacts can lead to genetic admixture. We investigated how the genetic population structure and the patterns of genetic admixture of Esox lucius L. (the northern pike) vary with the type of ecosystem and the integrity of the ecosystem assessed by measures under the European Water Framework Directive. The pike inhabits river, lake and brackish water ecosystems, where it is confronted with different ecological disturbances. We analysed 1,384 pike samples from the North, Baltic and Black Sea drainages and differentiated between metapopulations from each hydrogeographic region using genotypes from 15 microsatellites and mitochondrial cyt b sequences. Individual populations showed signs of genetic admixture ranging from almost zero to complete replacement by foreign genotypes. Hierarchical general linear modeling revealed a highly significant positive association of the degree of genetic admixture with decreasing ecological status. This may mean that populations in disturbed environments are more prone to influences by foreign genotypes or, alternatively, increased genetic admixture may indicate adaptation to rapid environmental changes. Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, our results suggest that anthropogenic alterations of natural freshwater ecosystems can influence genetic structures, which may lead to a large-scale reduction of intraspecific genetic diversity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.1%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
7
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%