Back

Levodopa Responsiveness Subtypes of Freezing of Gait: Results Using a Levodopa Challenge

McKay, J. L.; Goldstein, F. C.; Sommerfeld, B.; Bernhard, D.; Perez Parra, S.; Factor, S. A.

2019-06-11 neuroscience
10.1101/667071 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo demonstrate that levodopa-unresponsive freezing of gait (ONOFF-FOG), which is a disabling untreatable feature of Parkinsons disease (PD), is distinct from responsive/OFF only FOG (OFF-FOG) and potentially has a distinct pathophysiology.\n\nMethodsFifty-five PD patients completed levodopa challenges after >12 hours OFF with supratherapeutic doses to classify them as NOFOG, OFF-FOG or ONOFF-FOG. Serum levodopa levels ensured threshold levels were met. An \"ON\" response was defined as [&ge;]20% improvement in MDS-UPDRS-III score. Main outcome measure was MDS-UPDRS-III based on clinical exam, timed-up-and-go tests and 360{degrees} turns.\n\nResults45 patients exhibited an \"ON\" response to the challenge. Levodopa-equivalent-dose was 142{+/-}56% of patients typical morning doses. Patients could be classified as: 19 ONOFF-FOG, 11 OFF-FOG, 15 NOFOG. The ONOFF-FOG group exhibited significantly higher NFOG-Q, MDS-UPDRS-II/III scores compared to the OFF-FOG group. MDS-UPDRS-III total varied significantly across medication response states (P<0.01) and groups (P=0.03). Among MDS-UPDRS-III subdomains, significant effects of group (highest in ONOFF-FOG group) were identified for measures of lower extremities and gait. Linear mixed models revealed a highly significant association between serum levodopa level and MDS-UPDRS-III score that did not vary across the groups. There was a highly significant group interaction effect on the association between serum levodopa level with MDS-UPDRS-III item 11 \"Freezing of Gait\" (P<0.001).\n\nConclusionsONOFF-FOG is a distinct subtype of FOG in PD, as opposed to OFF-FOG. This is an important step in demonstrating that FOG is not a single entity and, in turn, could lead to better understanding of pathophysiology and development of effective therapies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.