Back

Practical and safe method of cryopreservation for clinical application of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells without a programmable freezer or serum

Gao, S.; Takami, A.; Takeshita, K.; Niwa, R.; Kato, H.; Nakayama, T.

2019-06-07 cell biology
10.1101/664524 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAdipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic modality for cellular therapy because of their rapid proliferation and potent cellular activity compared to conventional bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Cosmetic lipoaspirates provide an easily obtainable source of ADSCs. Cryopreservation facilitates their clinical application due to increased transportability and pooling of sufficient numbers of cells. However, proper cryopreservation techniques have not been established yet.\n\nMethodsWe evaluated the post-thaw viability and ADSC functions after cryopreservation with three cryoprotectants (serum containing 10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), serum-free: CP-1TM, DMSO-free: SCB-DFTM) at two temperature (-80{degrees}C, -150{degrees}C) and two cell densities: (1 x 106, 7 x 106 cells/mL) for up to 18 months using cryovials. After determining optimal conditions, we also tested if large quantities of ADSCs remained viable after 18 months of cryopreservation in a 100-mL cryobag. Rate-controlled freezing methods or liquid nitrogen storage were not exploited.\n\nResultsADSCs cryopreserved in serum containing 10% DMSO or CP-1TM at -150{degrees}C and 7 x 106 cells/mL were most viable (>85%) after 18 months without perturbation of MSC functions. Even suboptimal conditions (-80{degrees}C, 1 x 106 cells/mL, no DMSO) assured >80% viability when stored for up to 9 months. Large quantities of ADSCs in a cryobag were properly cryopreserved.\n\nConclusionsA programmable freezer or liquid nitrogen storage is not necessary. CP-1TM is preferable in terms of side effects. Simplified cryopreservation methods (-80{degrees}C and no DMSO) can be used for up to 9 months, resulting in reduced infusion toxicities and lower costs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
3
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
8
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
14
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%