Transposons played a major role in the diversification between the closely related almond (Prunus dulcis) and peach (P. persica) genomes: Results from the almond genome sequence
Alioto, T.; Alexiou, K.; Bardil, A. M.; Barteri, F.; Castanera, R.; Cruz, F.; Dhingra, A.; Duval, H.; Fernandez i Marti, A.; Frias, L.; Galan, B.; Garcia, J. L.; Howad, W.; Gomez Garrido, J.; Gut, M.; Julca, I.; Morata, J.; Puigdomenech, P.; Ribeca, P.; Rubio-Cabetas, M. J.; Vlasova, A.; Wirthensohn, M.; Garcia-Mas, J.; Gabaldon, T.; Casacuberta, J. M.; Arus, P.
Show abstract
Combining both short and long-read sequencing, we have estimated the almond Prunus dulcis cv. Texas genome size in 235 Mbp and assembled 227.6 Mb of its sequence. The highly heterozygous compact genome of Texas comprises eight chromosomes, to which we have anchored over 91% of the assembly. We annotated 27,042 protein-coding genes and 6,800 non-coding transcripts. High levels of genetic variability were characterized after resequencing a collection of ten almond accessions. Phylogenomic comparison with the genomes of 16 other close and distant species allowed estimating that almond and peach diverged around 5.88 Mya. Comparison between peach and almond genomes confirmed the high synteny between these close relatives, but also revealed high numbers of presence-absence variants, many attributable to the movement of transposable elements (TEs). The number and distribution of TEs between peach and almond was similar, but the history of TE movement was distinct, with peach having a larger proportion of recent transpositions and almond preserving a higher level of polymorphism in the older TEs. When focusing on specific genes involved in key characters such as the bitter vs. sweet kernel taste and the formation of a fleshy mesocarp, we found that for one gene associated with the biosynthesis of amygdalin that confers the bitter kernel taste, several TEs were inserted in its vicinity only in sweet almond cultivars but not in bitter cultivars and Prunus bitter kernel relatives, including P. webbii, P. mume, and other species like peach and cherry. TE insertions likely to produce affects in the expression of six more genes involved in the formation of the fleshy mesocarp were also identified. Altogether, our results suggest a key role of TEs in the recent history and diversification of almond with respect to peach.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reference genome for the highly transformable Setaria viridis cultivar ME034V 98%
- Diploid chromosome-scale assembly of the Muscadinia rotundifolia genome supports chromosome fusion and disease resistance gene expansion during Vitis and Muscadinia divergence 97%
- Whole-genome sequence and methylome profiling of the almond (Prunus dulcis D.A.Webb) cultivar Nonpareil 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole Genome Assembly and Annotation of Northern Wild Rice, Zizania palustris L., Supports a Whole Genome Duplication in the Zizania Genus 97%
- Genome and transcriptome architecture of allopolyploid okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) 97%
- A chromosome-scale genome assembly of European Hazel (Corylus avellana L.) reveals targets for crop improvement 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Chromosome level genome assembly and annotation of highly invasive Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) 97%
- Synteny identifies reliable orthologs for phylogenomics and comparative genomics of the Brassicaceae 96%
- Distinct life histories impact dikaryotic genome evolution in the rust fungus Puccinia striiformis causing stripe rust in wheat 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Telomere-to-telomere, gap-free genome of mung beans (Vigna radiata) provides insights into domestication under structural variation 97%
- Deciphering octoploid strawberry evolution with serial LTR similarity matrices for subgenome partition 96%
- A wild Cucurbita genome reveals the role of structural variants and introgression in domestication 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.