Back

End-to-end assessment of fecal bacteriome analysis: from sample processing to DNA sequencing and bioinformatics results

Christoff, A. P.; Cruz, G. N. F.; Sereia, A. F. R.; Yamanaka, L. E.; Silveira, P. P.; de Oliveira, L. F. V.

2020-02-18 microbiology
10.1101/646349 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intestinal microbiome, comprising the whole microbiota, their genes and genomes living in the human gut have significant roles in promoting health or disease status. As many studies showed so far, identifying the bacterial components of the microbiome can reveal important biomarkers to help in the disease comprehension to a further adequate treatment. However, the human nature is quite variable considering the genetic components associated with life styles, directly reflecting on the gut microbiome. Thus, it is extremely important to know the populational microbiome background in order to draw conclusions regarding the health and disease conditions. Also, methodological best practices and knowledge about the methods being used are essential for the results quality and applicability with clinical relevance. In this way, we standardized the sample collection and processing methods used for the Probiome assay, a test developed to identify the Brazilian bacteriome from stool samples. EncodeTools Metabarcode pipeline of analysis was developed to obtain the best result from the samples. This pipeline uses the information of amplicon single variants (ASVs) in 100% identical oligotype clusters, and performs a de novo taxonomical assignment based on similarity for unknown sequences. To better comprehend the results obtained in Probiome assays, is essential to know the intestinal bacteriome diversity of Brazilians. Thus, we applied the standardized methods herein developed and began characterizing our populational data to allow a better understanding of the Brazilian bacteriome profiles and how they can be related to other microbiome studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
3
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
11
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
12
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
15
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%