Back

Neurocognitive mechanisms of d-cycloserine augmented single-session exposure therapy for anxiety

Reinecke, A.; Nickless, A.; Browning, M.; Harmer, C.

2019-06-02 clinical trials
10.1101/615757 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveDrugs targeting the N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) system and the ability to learn new associations have been proposed as potential adjunct treatments to boost the success of exposure therapy for anxiety disorders. However, the effects of the NMDA partial agonist d-cycloserine on psychological treatment have been mixed. We investigated potential neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the clinical effects of d-cycloserine-augmented exposure, to inform the optimal combination of this and similar agents with psychological treatment. MethodsUnmedicated patients with panic disorder were randomised to single-dose d-cycloserine (250mg; N=17) or matching placebo (N=16) 2hrs before one session of exposure therapy. Neurocognitive markers were assessed one day after treatment, including reaction-time based threat bias for fearful faces and amygdala response to threat. Clinical symptom severity was measured using self-report and clinician-rated scales the day before and after treatment, and at 1- and 6-months follow-up. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. ResultsOne day after treatment, threat bias for fearful faces and amygdala threat response were attenuated in the drug compared to the placebo group. Lower amygdala magnitude predicted greater clinical improvement during follow-up across groups. D-cycloserine led to greater clinical recovery at 1-month follow-up (d-cycloserine 71% versus placebo 25%). DiscussionD-cycloserine-augmented single-session exposure therapy reduces amygdala threat response, and this effect predicts later clinical response. These findings highlight a neurocognitive mechanism by which d-cycloserine may exert its augmentative effects on psychological treatment and bring forward a marker that may help understand and facilitate future development of adjunct treatments with CBT for anxiety disorders. (D-cycloserine Augmented CBT for Panic Disorder; clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01680107)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.0%
3
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
7
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
8
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
10
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
17
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Neurobiology of Stress
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%