Implications of data-driven analyses for personalized therapy in psychosis: a systematic review of cluster- and trajectory-based modelling studies
Habtewold, T. D.; Rodijk, L. H.; Liemburg, E. J.; Sidorenkov, G.; Boezen, H. M.; Bruggeman, R.; Alizadeh, B. Z.
Show abstract
IntroductionTo tackle the phenotypic heterogeneity of schizophrenia, data-driven methods are often applied to identify subtypes of its (sub)clinical symptoms though there is no systematic review. AimsTo summarize the evidence from cluster- and trajectory-based studies of positive, negative and cognitive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, their siblings and healthy people. Additionally, we aimed to highlight knowledge gaps and point out future directions to optimize the translatability of cluster- and trajectory-based studies. MethodsA systematic review was performed through searching PsycINFO, PubMed, PsycTESTS, PsycARTICLES, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies published from 2008 to 2019, which reported at least two statistically derived clusters or trajectories were included. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. ResultsOf 2,285 studies retrieved, 50 studies (17 longitudinal and 33 cross-sectional) conducted in 30 countries were selected for review. Longitudinal studies discovered two to five trajectories of positive and negative symptoms in patient, and four to five trajectories of cognitive deficits in patient and sibling. In cross-sectional studies, three clusters of positive and negative symptoms in patient, four clusters of positive and negative schizotypy in sibling, and three to five clusters of cognitive deficits in patient and sibling were identified. These studies also reported multidimensional predictors of clusters and trajectories. ConclusionsOur findings indicate that (sub)clinical symptoms of schizophrenia are more heterogeneous than currently recognized. Identified clusters and trajectories can be used as a basis for personalized psychiatry.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Central oxidative stress and early vocational outcomes in first episode psychosis: A 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy study of glutathione 96%
- Latent Factors of Language Disturbance and Relationships to Quantitative Speech Features 95%
- Can we detect the undetected? Comparing the prodromes of individuals with first episode psychosis detected and undetected by clinical high risk for psychosis services: an electronic health record study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Moderate to severe negative symptoms predict low risk of symptoms worsening in schizophrenia patients in CATIE 96%
- Blink rates in patients with schizophrenia compared to healthy controls: A meta-analysis 95%
- Dopamine D1 receptor availability is not associated with delusional ideation measures of psychosis proneness 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Schizophrenia Polygenic Risk Score and 20-Year Course of Illness in Psychotic Disorders 95%
- Protein expression of prenyltransferase subunits in postmortem schizophrenia dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 95%
- Affinity Scores: An Individual-centric Fingerprinting Framework for Neuropsychiatric Disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the Proportion of Patients Who Experience a Prodrome Prior to Psychosis Onset - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
- Cerebral cortical alterations in adolescent early-onset psychosis: a surface-based morphometry mega-analysis 94%
- Interrelations Between Dopaminergic-, GABAergic- and Glutamatergic Neurotransmitters in Antipsychotic-Naïve Psychosis Patients and the Association to Initial Treatment Response 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.