Back

Thermal preference influences depth use but not biomass of predatory fishes in response to lake morphometry

Bartley, T. J.; Guzzo, M. M.; Cazelles, K.; Verville, A.; McMeans, B. C.; McCann, K. S.

2019-12-03 ecology
10.1101/572925 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Top predators responses to environmental conditions shape food web architecture and influence ecosystem structure and stability. Yet the impacts of fundamental properties like ecosystem size and morphometry on top predators behaviour are poorly understood. We examined how lake morphometry impacts the behaviour (inferred by depth use) of three key fish top predators--the cold-adapted lake trout, the cool-adapted walleye, and the warm-adapted smallmouth bass-- which can each strongly impact local food web structure. We used catch-per-unit-effort data from nearly 500 boreal lakes of Ontario, Canada to evaluate the role of thermal preference in dictating mean depth of capture and biomass index in response to lake morphometry. We found evidence that thermal preferences influence how species depth use and biomass changed with lake size, proportion of littoral area, and maximum lake depth, although we found no relationship with lake shape. However, found no strong evidence that lake morphology influences these species biomasses, despite theory that predicts such a relationship. Our results suggest that some aspects of lake morphometry can alter habitat accessibility and productivity in ways that influence the behaviour and biomass of these top predator species depending on their thermal preferences. Our results have implications for how lake food webs expand and contract with lake morphometry and other key abiotic factors. We argue that several key abiotic factors likely drive top predator depth use in ways that may shape local food web structure and play an important role in determining the ultimate fate of ecosystems with environmental change.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
2
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
8
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
11
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
13
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
17
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
18
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
19
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
20
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
23
Limnology and Oceanography
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
25
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
26
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%