Back

Murburn concept explains the acutely lethal effect of cyanide

Manoj, K. M.; Ramasamy, S.; Parashar, A.; Soman, V.; Pakshirajan, K.

2019-06-18 biochemistry
10.1101/555888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyanide (CN) toxicity is traditionally understood to result from its binding of hemeFe centers, thereby disrupting mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase function and oxygen utilization by other globin proteins. Recently, a diffusible reactive oxygen species (DROS) mediated reaction mechanism called murburn concept was proposed to explain mitochondrial ATP-synthesis and heat generation. Per this purview, it was theorized that CN ion-radical equilibrium dissipates the catalytically vital DROS into futile cycles, producing water. In the current study, a comparative quantitative assessment of the above two explanations is made for: (i) lethal dosage or concentrations of CN, (ii) thermodynamics and kinetics of the binding/reaction, and (iii) correlation of CN with the binding data and reaction chemistry of H2S/CO. The quantitative findings suggest that the hemeFe binding-based toxicity explanation is untenable. CN also inhibited the experimental in vitro DROS-mediated coupling of inorganic phosphate with ADP. Further, pH-dependent inhibition profiles of heme enzyme catalyzed oxidation of a phenolic (wherein an -OH group reacts with DROS to form water, quite akin to the murburn model of ATP synthesis) indicated that- (i) multiple competitive reactions in milieu controlled outcomes and (ii) low concentrations of CN cannot disrupt activity via a coordination (binding) of cyanide at the distal hemeFe. Therefore, the M-level IC50 and the acutely lethal effect of CN on cellular respiration could be explained by the deleterious interaction of CN ion-radical equilibrium with DROS in matrix, disrupting mitochondrial ATP synthesis. This work supports the murburn explanation for cellular respiration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.