Back

Murburn concept explains the acutely lethal effect of cyanide

Manoj, K. M.; Ramasamy, S.; Parashar, A.; Soman, V.; Pakshirajan, K.

2019-06-18 biochemistry
10.1101/555888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyanide (CN) toxicity is traditionally understood to result from its binding of hemeFe centers, thereby disrupting mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase function and oxygen utilization by other globin proteins. Recently, a diffusible reactive oxygen species (DROS) mediated reaction mechanism called murburn concept was proposed to explain mitochondrial ATP-synthesis and heat generation. Per this purview, it was theorized that CN ion-radical equilibrium dissipates the catalytically vital DROS into futile cycles, producing water. In the current study, a comparative quantitative assessment of the above two explanations is made for: (i) lethal dosage or concentrations of CN, (ii) thermodynamics and kinetics of the binding/reaction, and (iii) correlation of CN with the binding data and reaction chemistry of H2S/CO. The quantitative findings suggest that the hemeFe binding-based toxicity explanation is untenable. CN also inhibited the experimental in vitro DROS-mediated coupling of inorganic phosphate with ADP. Further, pH-dependent inhibition profiles of heme enzyme catalyzed oxidation of a phenolic (wherein an -OH group reacts with DROS to form water, quite akin to the murburn model of ATP synthesis) indicated that- (i) multiple competitive reactions in milieu controlled outcomes and (ii) low concentrations of CN cannot disrupt activity via a coordination (binding) of cyanide at the distal hemeFe. Therefore, the M-level IC50 and the acutely lethal effect of CN on cellular respiration could be explained by the deleterious interaction of CN ion-radical equilibrium with DROS in matrix, disrupting mitochondrial ATP synthesis. This work supports the murburn explanation for cellular respiration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Chemistry – A European Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
4
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
5
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
12
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
17
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
20
ACS Catalysis
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Chemistry
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
RSC Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
28
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
ChemMedChem
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%