Back

Identifying Drug Sensitivity Subnetworks with NETPHIX

Kim, Y.-A.; Sarto Basso, R.; Wojtowicz, D.; Hochbaum, D. S.; Vandin, F.; Przytycka, T. M.

2019-10-22 bioinformatics
10.1101/543876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phenotypic heterogeneity in cancer is often caused by different patterns of genetic alterations. Understanding such phenotype-genotype relationships is fundamental for the advance of personalized medicine. One of the important challenges in the area is to predict drug response on a personalized level. The pathway-centric view of cancer significantly advanced the understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships. However, most of network identification methods in cancer focus on identifying subnetworks that include general cancer drivers or are associated with discrete features such as cancer subtypes, hence cannot be applied directly for the analysis of continuous features like drug response. On the other hand, existing genome wide association approaches do not fully utilize the complex proprieties of cancer mutational landscape. To address these challenges, we propose a computational method, named NETPHLIX (NETwork-to-PHenotpe mapping LeveragIng eXlusivity), which aims to identify mutated subnetworks that are associated with drug response (or any continuous cancer phenotype). Utilizing properties such as mutual exclusivity and interactions among genes, we formulate the problem as an integer linear program and solve it optimally to obtain a set of genes satisfying the constraints. NETPHLIX identified gene modules significantly associated with many drugs, including interesting response modules to MEK1/2 inhibitors in both directions (increased and decreased sensitivity to the drug) that the previous method, which does not utilize network information, failed to identify. The genes in the modules belong to MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, which is the targeted pathway of the drug.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
5
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
11
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
16
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
20
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
25
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%