Back

Effects of long-lasting insecticide net (LLINs) ownership/utilisation indicators on annual household malaria episodes (AHMEs) in three Health Districts in Cameroon

Cho, F. N.; Fru, P. N.; Cho, B. M.; Munguh, S. F.; Jokwi, P. K.; Ngah, Y. E.; Fru, C. N.; Tassang, A. N.; Ekobo, A. S.

2021-07-09 epidemiology
10.1101/488445 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionHousehold residents in malaria endemic areas are at high risk of multiple malaria episodes per year. This study investigated the annual household malaria episodes (AHMEs) in three health districts in Cameroon. MethodsA community-based cross-sectional household survey using a multi-stage cluster design was conducted 2 - 3 years post campaign to assess long-lasting insecticide net (LLINs) ownership, utilisation, and maintenance as well as demographic characteristics. Multinomial regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with household LLIN ownership, utilization, and AHME. ResultsHousehold LLINs ownership, de-facto population with universal utilisation, and AHME were respectively, 92.5%, 16.0%, and 83.4%; thus, 4 out of 25 household residents effectively used LLINs the previous night. AHME was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with age and gender (OR; 1.6, 95% C.I; 1.1 - 2.3) of household head, health district (OR; 2.8, 95% C.I; 1.1 - 7.2) and tiredness (OR; 2.6, 95% C.I; 1.0 - 6.3). LLINs ownership and insufficiency also significantly contributed to AHME. The overall average cost for the treatment of malaria was 6,399.4{+/-}4,892.8Fcfa (11.1{+/-}8.5US$). ConclusionsThe proportion of households with at least one LLIN and those with at least one AHME were high. Findings are of concern given that average cost for the treatment of malaria represents a potentially high economic burden. The results outlined in this paper provide an important tool for the examination of the deficiencies in LLINs regular and universal utilisation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.