Back

Studies of NH4+ and NO3- uptake ability of subalpine plants and resource-use strategy identified by their functional traits.

Legay, N.; Grassein, F.; Arnoldi, C.; Raphael, S.; Philippe, L.; Lavorel, S.; Clement, J.-C.

2020-01-07 ecology
10.1101/372235 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWThe leaf economics spectrum (LES) is based on a suite of leaf traits related to plant functioning and ranges from resource-conservative to resource-acquisitive strategies. However, the relationships with root traits, and the associated belowground plant functioning such as N uptake, including nitrate (NO3-) and ammonium (NH4+), is still poorly known. Additionally, environmental variations occurring both in time and in space could uncouple LES from root traits. We explored, in subalpine grasslands, the relationships between leaf and root morphological traits for 3 dominant perennial grass species, and to what extent they contribute to the whole-plant economics spectrum. We also investigated the link between this spectrum and NO3- and NH4+ uptake rates, as well as the variations of uptake across four grasslands differing by the land-use history at peak biomass and in autumn. Although poorly correlated with leaf traits, root traits contributed to an economic spectrum at the whole plant level. Higher NH4+ and NO3- uptake abilities were associated with the resource-acquisitive strategy. Nonetheless, NH4+ and NO3- uptake within species varied between land-uses and with sampling time, suggesting that LES and plant traits are good, but still incomplete, descriptors of plant functioning. Although the NH4+: NO3- uptake ratio was different between plant species in our study, they all showed a preference for NH4+, and particularly the most conservative species. Soil environmental variations between grasslands and sampling times may also drive to some extent the NH4+ and NO3- uptake ability of species. Our results support the current efforts to build a more general framework including above- and below-ground processes when studying plant community functioning.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.7%
3
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
5
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
12
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
14
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
15
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
16
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
20
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
26
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
27
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Applied Soil Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%