Back

Cuticular hydrocarbon divergence in Drosophila melanogaster populations evolving under differential operational sex ratios

Dutta, R.; Chechi, T. S.; Yadav, A.; Prasad, N. G.

2020-07-13 evolutionary biology
10.1101/351718 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability of interlocus sexual conflict to facilitate reproductive isolation is widely anticipated. However, very few experimental evolutionary studies have convincingly demonstrated the evolution of reproductive isolation due to sexual conflict. Recently a study on replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster under differential sexual conflict found that divergent mate preference evolved among replicate populations under high sexual conflict regime. The precopulatory isolating mechanism underlying such divergent mate preference could be sexual signals such as cuticular hydrocarbons since they evolve rapidly and are involved in D. melanogaster mate recognition. Using D. melanogaster replicates used in the previous study, we investigate whether cuticular hydrocarbon divergence bears signatures of sexually antagonistic coevolution that led to reproductive isolation among replicates of high sexual conflict regime. We found that D. melanogaster cuticular hydrocarbon profiles are sexually dimorphic. Although replicate populations under high sexual conflict displayed assortative mating, we found no significant differences in the cuticular hydrocarbon profile between the high and low sexual conflict regimes. Instead we find cuticular hydrocarbon divergence patterns to be suggestive of the Buridans Ass regime which is one of the six possible mechanisms to resolve sexual conflict. Sexual selection that co-vary between populations under high and low sexual conflict regimes may also have contributed to the evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons. This study indicates that population differentiation as a result of cuticular hydrocarbon divergence cannot be credited to sexual conflict despite high sexual conflict regime evolving divergent cuticular hydrocarbon profiles.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
4
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
23
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
27
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%