Back

Patterns of Microbial Succession and Niche Differentiation Across Depth and Age in a Landfill Have Implications for Management Strategies

Rodriguez-Ramos, D.; Hou, L.; Tran, P. Q.; Chen, W.; Nielsen-Fox, H.; Shatara, F. J.; Rivera-Kohr, D. A.; Skarlupka, J. H.; Shroff, N. P.; Cagle, G.; Freedman, Z.; Rathsack, A.; Suen, G.; Fox, B. G.; Majumder, E. L.- W.

2025-12-01 microbiology
10.1101/2025.11.30.686798 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite microorganisms being primarily responsible for landfill material decomposition, limited characterization has been performed across both landfill depth and age. Here, we investigated the microbial communities and physicochemical parameters in two active and two closed landfill wells from surface to bottom, as well as fill dirt and leachate at a sanitary landfill near Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Amplicon community sequencing fungi, bacteria and archaea revealed distinct microbial community structures across landfill sites. The observed patterns of microbial community succession by depth and age mirror the known phases of the landfill life cycle. Younger surface samples were dominated by aerobic fungi, which transitioned to fermentative bacteria and methanogenic archaea in older, deeper, layers. Simultaneously, high species richness was preserved across landfill ages, while reduced evenness at specific depths support spatial niche differentiation. In conjunction with the lack of trends found for physicochemical parameters by depth, this supports niche differentiation driven by the highly heterogenous waste inputs. This study provides the first comprehensive vertical profile of bacterial, fungal, and archaeal communities across landfill depths and ages, highlighting the influence of these parameters on physicochemical factors and microbial distribution within landfills. These results have implications for improving landfill management, including renewable gas energy production, minimizing emissions, and increasing degradation rates.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.