Back

Experience from an HTS campaign: Investigation of susceptibility and rescue of SARS-CoV-2 nsp3 protease assay from metal contamination

Georgiou, I.; O'Neill, S.; Robinson, C.; Cunningham, F.; O'Byrne, S. N.; Gray, D.; Scott, D. E.; Gilbert, I. H.

2025-11-27 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.11.27.690678 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Different biochemical assays yield different rates of false positives than others either due to the nature of the enzyme, the technology associated with the assay, or properties of the compounds being screened. Ensuring that the right counter-screens are in place to identify false positives without wasting time and resources on them is of great importance. Herein we describe the results of a high throughput screen (HTS) against non-structural protein 3 (nsp3) protease PLPro, which resulted exclusively in false-positive hits. By triaging hit compounds through purification of metal chelating resin, we identified contamination by either copper or palladium as the most likely source of false positives from the library screening campaign. We then performed a systematic assessment of the vulnerability of nsp3 protease screening to metal contamination and evaluated common additives to combat the inhibitory effects of different metal salts. We further conducted a thorough survey of the literature reports of nsp3 HTS campaigns with a focus on the presence of additives and what metal susceptibility was likely, given the results of our work. We conclude that the majority of reported nsp3 screens are susceptible to copper contamination with a smaller proportion also potentially susceptible to palladium contamination.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
3
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
9
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
ChemMedChem
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
24
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
30
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%