ONCOchannelome: A computational framework to investigate altered ion channels across tumor types
Parthasarathi, K. T. S.; Ramu, S.; Jolly, M. K.; Sharma, J.
Show abstract
Conventional approaches for analyzing ion channels in cancer primarily focus on the detection of membrane potential to record the polarization states of the cellular membrane. Although these approaches provide meaningful insights during validation, they face challenges in discovery, especially in identifying the ion channels that govern the membrane potential. Moreover, ion channels are known to exhibit context-dependent activity that often depends on the cancer type and metabolic state of the tumor. Here, we developed a computational framework, ONCOchannelome, that allows the identification of potential ion channels via transcriptomic datasets. We collected publicly available RNA-Seq datasets corresponding to 2421 normal, 5442 primary tumor and 588 metastatic samples of 15 tumor types. Using the data, we designed a computational strategy to merge the datasets, identifying differentially expressed ion channels in the tumor and metastatic states and aiding in the determination of ion channels in different tumor states. We subsequently developed strategies to determine the correlation of altered ion channels with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and to identify differentially coexpressed ion channel networks along with their possible transcription factors. The ONCOchannelome allows visualization of altered ion channels in the tumor and metastatic states in addition to revealing changes resulting in changes in biological processes and molecular functions as the tumor progresses. The ONCOchannelome enhances our understanding of the dependence of ion channels in different tumors in addition to revealing their observed alterations in progressing from the primary tumor state to the metastatic state.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular signatures for inflammation vary across cancer types and correlate significantly with tumor stage, gender and vital status of patients 94%
- Identification of cuproptosis and ferroptosis-related subtypes and development of a prognostic signature in colon cancer 94%
- Glyoxalase 1: emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in cervical cancer progression 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 96%
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 96%
- BNIP3 upregulation characterizes cancer cell subpopulation with increased fitness and proliferation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 94%
- Clustering of RNA co-expression network identifies novel long non-coding RNA biomarkers in squamous cell carcinoma 94%
- Uncovering Hidden Cancer Self-Dependencies through Analysis of shRNA-Level Dependency Scores 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Single Molecule Counting Assay to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cancer and Oncocytoma in Clinics 95%
- Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays 95%
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mime: A flexible machine-learning framework to construct and visualize models for clinical characteristics prediction and feature selection 93%
- Analysis of Mutations in Precision Oncology using The Automated, Accurate, and User-Friendly Web Tool PredictONCO 93%
- Modeling and analysis of site-specific mutations in cancer identifies known plus putative novel hotspots and bias due to contextual sequences 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.