Back

Novel 3D imaging technology, as adjunct to mammography, improves Specificity markedly without reducing Sensitivity in BIRADS-4 patients

Marmarelis, V.

2025-12-01 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.11.27.25341183 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the potential diagnostic improvement accrued from using the novel 3D breast imaging technology of Multimodal UltraSonic Tomography (MUST) as adjunct to digital mammography for BI-RADS 4 patients referred to biopsy (clinical trial # EUDAMED/CIV-ID CIV-GR-22-05-039513). MethodsMUST generates 3D tomographic images of pendant breast in water-bath using transmission-mode ultrasound measurements of acoustic refractivity and frequency-dependent attenuation. These measurements are fused via a properly developed algorithm into "advisory diagnostic images" (ADI) depicting the likelihood of malignancy at each voxel of the entire breast volume. In this clinical trial, MUST imaging was performed prior to biopsy on 207 BI-RADS 4 patients presenting micro-calcifications in mammography. The findings of the MUST ADI in the biopsy region were evaluated against the biopsy results ResultsBiopsy histopathology identified malignant lesions in 54 patients (26.2%). MUST ADI detected correctly all these malignancies (down to 2 mm in maximum dimension). In 31 of the 153 participants with negative biopsy (20.3%), MUST ADI found some "likely malignant" lesions within 20-mm radius from the putative point of biopsy. Breast density varied across the cohort, with 65.2% having dense breasts (ACR score 3-4). No dependence of MUST diagnostic performance on breast density was found in this cohort. ConclusionMUST imaging detected correctly all 54 biopsy-confirmed malignant breast lesions (down to 2 mm) among 207 BI-RADS 4 participants (NPV = 100%), while detecting "likely malignancy" in the biopsy region of 31 participants with negative biopsy (PPV = 63.5%), irrespective of breast density. Key messages- MUST detected all 54 biopsy-confirmed malignant lesions in 207 BI-RADS 4 patients (NPV=100%) - MUST detected some malignancy in the region of biopsy in 31 cases with negative biopsy (PPV=63.5%) - The diagnostic performance of MUST was independent of breast density

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.4%
3
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.1%
5
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
6
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
9
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.3%
12
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
15
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%