Back

Pan-oesophageal and spatially resolved genetic analysis reveals instability signature for earlier diagnosis of squamous cell cancer

Yusuf, A.; Malhotra, S.; O'Donovan, M.; Devonshire, G.; Killcoyne, S.; Turkot, M. H.; Mroz, A.; Lenarcik, M.; Mikula, M.; Pilonis, N. D.; Regula, J.; Kaminski, M. F.; Nowicki-Osuch, K.; Januszewicz, W.; Fitzgerald, R. C.

2025-11-30 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.11.27.25340016 medRxiv
Show abstract

Early detection of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) significantly improves patients survival. Nonetheless, the availability of non-endoscopic, effective, and minimally invasive diagnostic approaches is limited. Here, we evaluated the utility of minimally invasive pan-oesophageal sampling using a capsule-sponge and aneuploidy detection using shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) for early detection of OSCC and precancerous intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). In the prospective arm, 200 participants underwent the capsule-sponge procedure, and we performed sWGS from 178 successfully collected specimens (89%). We combined newly developed genome-wide copy-number alteration (GW-CNA) score and copy number alterations (CNAs) at chromosomal arm level to measure global and local aneuploidy, respectively. Logistic regression model identified GW-CNA and CNAs on chromosomal arms 2q, 3q, 9p and 11q as key diagnostic predictors differentiating OSCC and IEN from healthy controls (AUC of 0.920 (95% CI: 0.907-0.933), accuracy: 0.888, sensitivity: 0.896, specificity: 0.887). The model outperformed histology-based diagnosis using H&E staining and p53 immunohistological assessment. Finally, the analysis of microdissected samples derived from retrospective endoscopic en-bloc resections, and spanning the entire pathological continuum of OSCC demonstrated stepwise increase in GW-CNA and CNAs of 2q, 3q, 9p and 11q, validating their biological significance. This study demonstrates the high potential of combined pan-oesophageal sampling and sWGS aneuploidy analysis for early detection of OSCC and as a potential path to improved patients outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
5
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
6
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.0%
11
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
12
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
14
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
22
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Cell Death & Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%