Divergent biofilm and free-living microbial communities on Phragmites australis and in plankton across an eutrophication gradient in the Great Masurian Lakes (Poland)
Smacchia, V.; Karlicki, M.; Kiersztyn, B.; Karnkowska, A.
Show abstract
Biofilms are key components of freshwater microbial communities, contributing critically to ecosystem functioning. Composed of both bacteria and protists, biofilm communities are shaped by environmental conditions and the lifestyle traits of their constituent organisms. Although biofilm and planktonic communities may share some taxa, the extent of the overlap and the factors driving community differentiation remain poorly understood. Here, we used high-throughput metabarcoding of 16S and 18S rRNA genes to investigate bacterial and protist communities associated with Phragmites australis stem biofilms and planktonic fractions across five lakes spanning an eutrophication gradient in the Masurian Lake District, northeastern Poland. The biofilm communities on reed stems were highly distinct from planktonic ones, sharing only a small core microbiome. The biofilm core not only exceeded that of planktonic communities but also contained characteristic taxa, identified via machine learning, that were distinct from planktonic assemblages, including several with potential roles in bioremediation and as bioindicators. Planktonic communities were strongly influenced by environmental factors, whereas Phragmites australis-associated epiphytic biofilm communities appeared more uniform across lakes, consistent with host-associated selection and potentially with lifestyle-related buffering. Moreover, biofilm suspensions exhibited higher apparent physiological activity per inoculum volume and broader substrate use under our assay conditions than the free-living communities. Altogether, our findings demonstrate the ecological significance of biofilms in freshwater systems and underscore the need to integrate both biofilm and planktonic fractions of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms to fully capture microbial diversity, function, and ecosystem resilience.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Rearing water microbiomes in white leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) larviculture assemble stochastically and are influenced by the microbiomes of live feed products 97%
- Seasonal cycles in a seaweed holobiont: A multiyear time series reveals repetitive microbial shifts and core taxa 96%
- High-temporal resolution of microbial food web dynamics and structure during phytoplankton blooms in the Baltic Sea 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of land use types and water chemical properties in structuring the microbiomes of a connected lakes system 98%
- Organic electron donors and terminal electron acceptors structure anaerobic microbial communities and interactions in a permanently stratified sulfidic lake 97%
- Abundance-occupancy relationships along taxonomic ranks reveal a consistency of niche differentiation in marine bacterioplankton with distinct lifestyles 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Energetic and Environmental Constraints on the Community Structure of Benthic Microbial Mats in Lake Fryxell, Antarctica 97%
- Seasonal dynamics of the microbial methane filter in the water column of a eutrophic coastal basin 97%
- Community stability increases the predictability of microeukaryote community coalescence outcomes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aquatic microbial community is partially functionally redundant: insights from an in situ reciprocal transplant experiment 98%
- Microbial Colonisation of Polyethylene in Offshore Marine Environments: Insights from the Southern and South Atlantic Oceans. 97%
- Impact of temperature on Legionella pneumophila, its protozoan host cells, and the microbial diversity of the biofilm community of a pilot cooling tower 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.