SaVor - A Reproducible Structural Variant Calling and Benchmarking Platform from Short-Read Data
Mugoya, T. D.; Sethuraman, A.
Show abstract
Structural variations (SVs) are differences in genomic regions that are larger than 1 kilobase-pair (Kbp) between individuals, and can arise from errant DNA repair mechanisms, whole genome duplications, and transposable element activity across the genome. Recent advances, optimizations, and cost reductions in next generation sequencing technologies have facilitated the exponential increase in the amount of available short read genomic data. Here we present SaVor, a flexible, reproducible SV calling workflow that accepts single or multi-lane short-read paired-end Illumina sequence data, or BAM files as input to generate a consensus SV call-set based on user-provided merge parameters. We tested SaVor on 1,165 Arabidopsis thaliana whole genome sequences and benchmarked its performance on a set of SVs derived from the same accessions using Lumpy. Intersection calls i.e. SVs supported by 3 SV callers showed the highest precision (>0.91) while union calls supported by at least 1 caller showed the highest recall (>0.88). We found that the former suffers from decreased recall (<0.51) and the latter decreased precision (<0.57). Depending on the merge strategy, trade-offs in recall and precision need to be considered for downstream analyses of SV call-sets from short-read data. SaVor is an open-source Snakemake pipeline and is available on GitHub at https://github.com/ChabbyTMD/SaVor
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Simulation with RADinitio Improves RADseq Experimental Design and Sheds Light on Sources of Missing Data 94%
- Accuracy of de novo assembly of DNA sequences from double-digest libraries varies substantially among software 93%
- Dsuite - fast D-statistics and related admixture evidence from VCF files 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.