LaCONIC: A Label-Aware and Graph-Guided Contrastive Multi-Omics Collaborative Learning Model for Cancer Risk Prediction
Liu, P.; Liang, X.; Luo, J.
Show abstract
Investigating accurate cancer survival prediction models has important clinical value for optimizing therapeutic strategies and improving clinical outcomes. Although an increasing number of models have shifted from relying solely on clinical variables to integrating multi-omics data, there remains insufficient exploitation and integrative utilization of gene regulatory network (GRN) structures and cancer subtype information, which limits the predictive accuracy and biological interpretability of multi-omics models. Therefore, this study proposes label-aware and graph-guided multi-omics collaborative learning framework, termed LaCONIC, to achieve accurate and interpretable cancer survival prediction. To obtain biologically meaningful regulatory features of different molecular types, we first construct a gene regulatory network comprising multiple molecular entities and their relations, and design a heterogeneous graph self-supervised pre-training module to obtain unified graph-based gene representations. To fully leverage multiomics and multi-modal information, we develop an adaptive cross-omics representation learning module that performs intraomics modality alignment (i.e., graph and expression modals) and inter-omics representation alignment, thereby achieving synergistic integration of multi-source information. Moreover, to comprehensively capture global cross-omics molecular interactions, we present a graph-guided cross-omics interactive learning module that explicitly encodes gene regulatory network priors within a Transformer-based architecture. Finally, we introduce cancer subtype information to construct a label-aware constraint mechanism that improves predictive performance while enhancing inter-class separability and intra-class consistency of the learned representations. Experiments on multiple cancer datasets show that LaCONIC outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in various metrics. SHAP-based interpretability analysis on breast cancer further identifies survival-associated regulatory modules and high-risk molecules (e.g., hsa-miR-148a-3p, ARMC1, TMEM242), highlighting its potential for biological mechanism elucidation and prognostic assessment. The source code is available at https://github.com/Liangyushi/LaCONIC.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- uniPort: a unified computational framework for single-cell data integration with optimal transport 96%
- CellFM: a large-scale foundation model pre-trained on transcriptomics of 100 million human cells 96%
- Features fusion or not: harnessing multiple pathological foundation models using Meta-Encoder for downstream tasks fine-tuning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- StereoMM: A Graph Fusion Model for Integrating Spatial Transcriptomic Data and Pathological Images 96%
- An in-depth comparison of linear and non-linear joint embedding methods for bulk and single-cell multi-omics 96%
- SHEST: Single-cell-level artificial intelligence from haematoxylin and eosin morphology for cell type prediction and spatial transcriptomics reconstruction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ELISL: Early-Late Integrated Synthetic Lethality Prediction in Cancer 96%
- TUGDA: Task uncertainty guided domain adaptation for robust generalization of cancer drug response prediction from in vitro to in vivo settings 96%
- MTM: a multi-task learning framework to predict individualized tissue gene expression profiles 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inferring spatial single-cell-level interactions through interpreting cell state and niche correlations learned by self-supervised graph transformer 96%
- An interpretable deep learning framework for genome-informed precision oncology 95%
- Sagittarius: Extrapolating Heterogeneous Time-Series Gene Expression Data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.