National Strategy to Reduce Cervical Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Are Health Facilities Complying? Case of Kilimanjaro Region
Yuda, P.; Kavindi, A.; Mpehongwa, G.; Mushi, D. L.; Kessy, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundCervical cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in Tanzania despite being largely preventable. In response, the Ministry of Health developed the Tanzania Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Strategic Plan (2020-2024), emphasizing secondary prevention strategies such as screening and pre-cancer treatment by health facilities across the country. However, by the year 2020, only 9% out of 6,447 health facilities were providing screening and treatment services in Tanzania. MethodsA cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted in the Kilimanjaro Region. Ten (10) health facilities offering cervical cancer screening services. A stratified sampling method was employed. Data was collected using the CECAP scorecard checklist. Data was analyzed using STATA 18, and facility performance was assessed based on readiness and guideline compliance thresholds. ResultsAmong 10 facilities that were assessed, only 60% were structurally ready to deliver quality cervical cancer screening services, and just 30% complied with national screening guidelines. Gaps were observed in the availability of treatment equipment, trained healthcare providers, follow-up mechanisms, and inadequate community outreach services. Out of 462 health facilities in the region, only 41(8.9%) facilities offer cervical cancer screening services, indicating major gaps in service availability and coverage limitations. ConclusionThe study reveals gaps in cervical cancer facility readiness and compliance with national guidelines in the Kilimanjaro region. Despite cervical cancer services availability, service integration, systemic, and operational barriers persist. Targeted investments in infrastructure, training, monitoring, and community engagement are essential to accelerate progress towards the national cervical cancer prevention goal.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 97%
- Community-based newborn care intervention fidelity and its implementation drivers in South Wollo Zone, North-east Ethiopia 97%
- Cervical Cancer Screening Outcomes for HIV-positive Women in the Lubombo and Manzini regions of Eswatini – Prevalence and Predictors of a Positive Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) Screen 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing Knowledge, Uptake and Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women in selected communities of Wakiso District in Uganda: A population-based study 97%
- Projected Cancer Burden, Challenges, and Barriers to Cancer Prevention and Control Activities in the State of Telangana 96%
- Level of completion along continuum of care for maternal and child health services and factors associated with it among women in Arba Minch Zuria Woreda, Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on National Survey Data 97%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 96%
- Use of health care services during the Covid-19 pandemic in Ethiopia: Evidence from a health facility survey 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19: Knowledge, Perception of Risk, Preparedness and Vaccine Acceptability among Healthcare Workers in Kenya 95%
- Estimating healthcare resource needs for COVID-19 patients in Nigeria 94%
- Involvement in family planning service utilization and associated factors among married men at Debre Tabor Town Northwest, Ethiopia, 2017 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.