Back

NanoBRET Tracer Development for Class I Bromodomain Target Engagement in Live Cells

Sneddon, M. S.; Tsou, C.-J.; Fu, X.; Shelat, A. A.; Pomerantz, W. C. K.

2025-11-26 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.11.25.689777 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epigenetic reader proteins, such as bromo-domains, are often associated with diseases such as cancer and inflammation. BET bromodomain inhibitors have been studied extensively; however, non-BET bromodomains are understudied. Moreover, available high-throughput biological assays to assess inhibitors are limited. One non-BET bromodomain-containing protein, BPTF, has a recently reported inhibitor, BZ1, with an in vitro affinity of 6.3 nM. Additionally, BZ1 is known to be non-selective towards other class I bromodomains PCAF, GCN5, and CECR2. Here, we use a BZ1 analog, BZ1-THQ, to design a small molecule NanoBRET tracer, MS-1, for assessing inhibitor functional activity through live-cell target engagement against the BPTF bromodomain. Further, we investigate the versatility of MS-1 against PCAF, GCN5, and CECR2. We observe that MS-1 is a broadly applicable NanoBRET tracer for class I bromodomains, effectively binding BPTF, PCAF, GCN5, and CECR2 in HEK293T cells at low to sub-micromolar concentrations. We report EC50 values of commercially available and in-house inhibitors to demonstrate tracer versatility for future target engagement studies and inhibitor development. Table of Contents artwork O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=142 SRC="FIGDIR/small/689777v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@149371forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c1e652org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f81fbaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1eb18f1_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Published in Bioconjugate Chemistry (predicted rank #16) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.