Back

Infective Endocarditis After Arrhythmia Device Implantation In Cardiac Surgery Patients

Martinsson, A.; Thorleifsson, S.; David, A.; Rawshani, A.; Snygg-Martin, u.; Redfors, B.; Hansson, E. C.; Taha, A.

2025-11-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.11.25.25341028 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPatients undergoing cardiac surgery face an increased risk of infective endocarditis (IE), a risk that may be further exacerbated by implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). This study aimed to assess the risk of IE after CIED implantation within 30 days of cardiac surgery and identify associated risk factors. MethodsAll patients in Sweden, with no previous CIED, who underwent first-time cardiac surgery between 2006 and 2020 were included in this nationwide registry-based study. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates were used to estimate the association between CIED implantation and the risk of IE. ResultsOut of 73,367 patients, 2,302 (3.1%) received a CIED within 30 days. Over a median follow-up of 6.5 years (interquartile range, 3.2-10.1 years), 1,556 patients (2.1%) developed IE. CIED implantation was associated with an increased IE risk (adjusted Hazard ratio (aHR) 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-1.77). Patients with IE had a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to those without IE (aHR 1.80; 95% CI 1.67-1.94; p<0.001). The type of cardiac surgery influenced IE risk, with valvular surgeries showing a higher incidence than coronary artery bypass grafting. Risk factors independently associated with IE included male sex, age at surgery, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. ConclusionsCIED implantation within 30 days after cardiac surgery is associated with an increased long-term risk of IE and subsequent mortality. The type of surgery and patient comorbidities influence the risk. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE What is new?O_LIIn this large nationwide registry study, cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) placed within 30 days after cardiac surgery were associated with a substantial and persistent risk of infective endocarditis. C_LIO_LIThe risk of infective endocarditis was influenced by the type of cardiac surgery and patient-specific factors, rather than the timing of device implantation. C_LI What are the clinical implications?O_LIAmong post-cardiac surgery patients at elevated risk for infective endocarditis (e.g., those undergoing valvular procedures) who require a CIED, selecting devices associated with lower infection risk--such as leadless pacemakers or non-transvenous ICDs--may be a preferable strategy when appropriate. C_LIO_LIThe optimal timing of CIED implantation after cardiac surgery remains uncertain. When delaying implantation, the rationale should center on allowing for potential recovery of conduction abnormalities, rather than attempting to mitigate the risk of device-related infection. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.4%
3
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.4%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
7
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
19
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%