REMOTE-Neuro: Co-produced Recommendations to Optimise Remote Neurology
Fuller, P.; Fearn, S.; Dace, S.; Wollam, A.; Zarkali, A.; Cowan, A.; Mountney, S.; Carr, G.; Eriksson, S. H.; Kipps, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine stakeholder experiences of remote neurology outpatient care and to co-produce an evidence-based framework to support safe, equitable and sustainable service delivery. MethodsWe undertook an inductive thematic analysis of free-text responses from three national surveys: a patient and carer survey conducted by The Neurological Alliance (2021; n = 2,463) and two surveys of neurologists conducted by the Association of British Neurologists (2020 and 2021; n = 593). Findings were validated through co-production workshops and interviews with patients, carers and healthcare professionals in 2024 (n = 64). Themes were triangulated and refined to generate stakeholder-endorsed recommendations. ResultsParticipants valued flexible choice in consultation modality, recognising the accessibility and convenience of remote care, but expressed concerns about clinical quality, privacy and equity. Both patients and clinicians viewed remote care as a distinct skill set requiring tailored training and stronger digital infrastructure. Importantly, some participants perceived remote appointments as less legitimate than in-person consultations, a novel and under-recognised challenge with implications for engagement and health equity. Five domains aligned with NHS transformation principles were identified: (1) patient-centred care, (2) neurology and specialist area considerations, (3) clinical safety and quality, (4) capacity and sustainability, and (5) operational efficiency. These findings informed the REMOTE-Neuro Framework (REcommendations for optimising Modality, Operational efficiency, Training and Equity in NEUROlogy). ConclusionsRemote care continues to offer significant benefits to both patients and clinicians. However, five years post-pandemic, there are still unresolved issues which limit its effective integration with face-to-face (F2F) care. Practice implicationsREMOTE-Neuro provides the first co-produced set of recommendations to support safe, inclusive and sustainable remote neurology practice. Grounded in over 3,000 stakeholder perspectives and aligned with NHS transformation priorities, it offers a practical roadmap for implementation in neurology and a transferable model for other specialties. What is already known on this topicO_LIRemote consultations are now a routine component of neurology outpatient care. C_LIO_LIHowever, there is limited evidence on how to integrate remote and face-to-face (F2F) modalities safely, effectively, and equitably. C_LI What this study addsO_LIThis large, multi-dataset, co-produced study presents the first evidence-based national framework to optimise remote neurology services. C_LIO_LIIt identifies key patient, clinician and system-level factors that shape the effectiveness, safety and perceived value of remote neurology care. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIThe REMOTE-Neuro framework provides actionable, co-produced recommendations that directly operationalise NHS outpatient transformation priorities. C_LIO_LIIt offers a practical structure to guide service design, clinical decision-making, training, digital inclusion strategies, and future evaluation of hybrid neurology models. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 93%
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 92%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 92%
- Socioeconomic and demographic patterning of family uptake of a paediatric electronic patient portal innovation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 94%
- Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of Mobile Stroke Units in England and Wales: a mixed methods study 93%
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a taxonomy of care coordination for people living with rare conditions: A qualitative study 95%
- Development of models of care coordination for rare conditions: A qualitative study 95%
- The COVID-19 pandemic impact on continuity of care provision on rare brain diseases and on Ataxia, Dystonia and PKU. A scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 94%
- Can we enhance neurorehabilitation through regional implementation of group-based telerehabilitation? A mixed methods evaluation of NeuroRehabilitation OnLine (NROL). 93%
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.