Back

Adolescent Normative Intervals for Body Surface Gastric Mapping: Spectral Analysis

Humphrey, G.; Schamberg, G.; Xu, B.; Dachs, N.; Foong, D.; Varghese, C.; Andrews, C. N.; Mousa, H.; Gharibans, A.; O'Grady, G.

2025-11-26 pediatrics
10.1101/2025.11.25.25340911 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveBody surface gastric mapping (BSGM) non-invasively assesses gastric myoelectrical activity along with real-time symptom reporting. In adults, the development of normative intervals has underpinned new explanatory phenotypes, aiding clinical decision-making. This study established normative reference intervals for adolescent BSGM metrics. Study DesignHealthy adolescents aged 12-17 years with a BMI <35 kg/m2 were recruited from New Zealand, Australia and the United States. BSGM using Gastric Alimetry (Alimetry, New Zealand) involved a 30-minute fast, followed by a 480-kcal meal, and a 4-hour postprandial recording. Reference intervals were calculated for four validated metrics: Principal Gastric Frequency (PGF), body mass index (BMI)-adjusted amplitude, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (GA-RI, indicating rhythm stability), and the fed-to-fasted amplitude ratio (ff-AR). Results were reported at the median and 5th and/or 95th percentiles as appropriate. ResultsA total of 107 participants (52.8% female, median age 14 [IQR 13-16], median BMI 20.1 [IQR 18.75-22.40]) with mixed ethnicities were included. No substantive correlations were observed between BSGM metrics and demographics or anthropometric data. Therefore, a single set of normative reference intervals was established. Median PGF was 3.06 cycles per minute; reference interval 2.72-3.37. Median BMI-adjusted amplitude was 37.80 {micro}V; reference interval 20.0-72.0. Median GA-RI was 0.51; reference interval [&ge;]0.22. Median ff-AR was 2.12; reference interval [&ge;]1.0. ConclusionThis study presents normative reference intervals for BSGM spectral metrics in adolescent populations, informing the interpretation of tests in research and clinical practice.

Published in Neurogastroenterology &amp; Motility · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
6
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
7
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
8
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
13
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
19
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%