Back

Development and Validation of the TikTok Addiction Scale-Short Form (TTAS-SF)

Galanis, P. A.; Katsiroumpa, A.; Konstantakopoulou, O.; Galani, O.; Tsiachri, M.; Moisoglou, I.

2025-11-25 public and global health
10.1101/2025.11.24.25340870 medRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVETo develop and validate a short version of the TikTok Addiction Scale, i.e. the TikTok Addiction Scale-Short Form (TTAS-SF). METHODConstruct validity of the TTAS-SF was assessed through corrected item-total correlations and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was examined using the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), and the Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10). Reliability was evaluated through multiple indices, including Cronbachs alpha, McDonalds omega, Cohens kappa, and the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTSCorrected item-total correlations and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the final version of the TTAS-SF includes six items in one factor. Concurrent validity of the TTAS-SF was excellent since we found statistically significant correlations between the TTAS-SF and the BSMAS, the PHQ-4, and the BFI{square}10. Cronbachs alpha and McDonalds Omega for the TTAS-SF was 0.805 and 0.817, respectively. Cohens kappa for the six items ranged from 0.789 to 0.905 (p < 0.001 in all cases). Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.993 (p < 0.001). Thus, the reliability of the TTAS-SF was excellent. The best cut-off point for the TTAS-SF was 13, indicating that TikTok users with TTAS-SF score [&ge;]13 were considered as users with a problematic TikTok use and high probability of addiction issues, and those with TTAS-SF score <13 as healthy users. CONCLUSIONSThe TTAS-SF is a one-factor 6-item scale with great reliability and validity. The TTAS-SF is a short and easy-to-use tool that measures levels of TikTok addiction in a couple of minutes. Valid measurement of TikTok addiction with brief and valid tools is essential to further understand predictors and consequences of this phenomenon.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.