Back

Affiliative behavioural phenotype and microglial activation predict social decision-making following immune activation

Hammond, E.; MONARI, P.; Luebke, E.; Johnson, A.; Auger, A.; Marler, C.

2025-11-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.23.690017 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Social animals are faced with a critical decision when sick: to affiliate or withdraw. The behavioural response during an immune challenge varies by individual and species. However, the social and biological factors leading to variation in this decision during an immune challenge are unknown. Here, we explore the affiliative behavioural phenotype, "huddlers" and "non-huddlers," as a social predictor, and microglial activation and peripheral cytokine expression as biological predictors of social-decision making during an immune challenge. To measure social-decision making, we recorded social approach and time spent in proximity to a familiar same-sex conspecific versus a novel object in the social California mouse following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment. Behavioural phenotype predicted both the social response to LPS and the relationship between cytokine activity and social behaviour, suggesting that social experience regulates social decision-making during sick versus healthy conditions. Additionally, we found that elevated microglia activity in the dentate gyrus (DG) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) negatively correlated with social behaviour, positioning these regions for future exploration for the role of microglia on social decision-making. Our results identify the predictive power of behavioural phenotypes on social response to sickness and a link between microglia and decision-making during sickness.

Published in Behavioural Brain Research (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.