A mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of IOTA-ADNEX ultrasound triage in NHS secondary care ovarian diagnostic one-stop clinics
Do, V.; Crisp, H.; Cummins, C.; Kannangara, S.; Smotra, G.; Tarbuck, B.; Duke, O.; Salar, A.; Jhita, N.; Sai, V.; Rati, N.; Sundar, S.
Show abstract
ObjectivesRobust evidence supports IOTA-ADNEX ultrasound triage at 10% threshold for ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis to identify women for referral to tertiary gynaecological cancer centres for further management. The IOTA-ADNEX risk prediction model has superior sensitivity compared to the current standard of care triage, Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI-1), yet NHS adoption is limited. In our survey of British Gynaecological Cancer Society clinicians only 30% (24/79) currently follow an IOTA model, despite 80% (63/79) supporting implementation. We evaluated IOTA-ADNEX implementation within two NHS one-stop clinics (OSC) for suspected OC, examining clinical outcomes alongside implementation barriers and facilitators. MethodsMixed-methods study conducted across two UK NHS hospitals between June 2023-June 2025. Implementation outcomes were surgical intervention rates comparing IOTA-ADNEX-guided and retrospectively calculated RMI-based management using NICE/RCOG thresholds and patient process metrics. 11 qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with NHS staff involved in OSC implementation and thematic analysis performed. ResultsOf 334 patients, 42% (139) underwent same-day discharge. Using IOTA-ADNEX at a 10% threshold, 10% (32/334) of patients underwent surgery under the general gynaecology and cancer unit team. In comparison, 30% (94/334) would have undergone surgery under the same teams if RMI-based triage had been used. Five themes identified from qualitative analysis: organisational infrastructure, clinical decision-making, communication and pathway definition, professional collaboration and training support, and patient experience. Key facilitators included dedicated clinical leadership, timely decision-making capabilities and quality assurance sessions. Barriers included lack of standardised post-clinic pathways and insufficient staff communication about pathway changes. ConclusionsIOTA-ADNEX implementation in one-stop clinics offer high same-day discharge rates and reduction in surgical rates compared to RMI triage. To ensure success, implementation should be supported by adequate infrastructure, training, and clear pathways. It requires leadership, comprehensive staff training, and robust communication strategies. These findings provide practical guidance for healthcare systems for wider implementation of IOTA-ADNEX. Key messagesThe IOTA-ADNEX ultrasound risk-assessment model to triage adnexal masses has demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy over RMI which remains the standard tool in UK ovarian cancer pathways, even when applied by certified non-expert sonographers, but implementation within UK NHS pathways remains limited. This mixed-method evaluation shows IOTA-ADNEX ultrasound triage can be successfully implemented in NHS one-stop clinics, reducing unnecessary benign surgeries compared to RMI and enabling high same-day discharge rates without missing invasive cancers. Findings on key facilitators and barriers highlight the need for infrastructure, training, and pathway clarity and will inform wider NHS adoption of IOTA-ADNEX.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 93%
- Head-to-head comparison of the RMI and ADNEX models to estimate the risk of ovarian malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of external validation studies 93%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 92%
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 92%
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining as a surrogate of β-catenin ( CTNNB1) mutations 90%
- Outcome of radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion associated with epithelial proliferations with atypia diagnosed on breast core biopsy - Results from a multicentric UK based study 89%
- Macrophage polarization in cesarean scar diverticulum 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 94%
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 93%
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 96%
- Evaluating the impact of an enhanced support implementation of the PReCePT (PRevention of Cerebral palsy in Pre-Term labour) quality improvement toolkit to increase the uptake of magnesium sulphate in pre-term deliveries for the prevention of neurodisabilities: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial 88%
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.