PathWeigh II: Graph Based Belief Propagation for Pathway Activity Analysis
Livne, D.
Show abstract
Pathway analysis is essential for understanding cellular phenotypes from gene expression data. However, existing methods struggle with feedback loops and fail to integrate gene-level evidence throughout pathway topology. We present PathWeigh II, an enhanced pathway analysis tool that employs graph decomposition and Gaussian-scaled belief propagation to model pathways as directed multi-graphs. Unlike previous approaches that average interaction activities, PathWeigh II propagates probabilistic beliefs through the network structure, naturally handling cyclic dependencies and combining observed expression data with topological inference. Using 357 curated pathways from KEGG and BioCarta, PathWeigh II provides biologically meaningful activity scores while maintaining computational efficiency. We demonstrate that PathWeigh II correctly converges on pathways with feedback loops where traditional methods fail and show how integrating internal gene evidence with propagated beliefs improves pathway characterization. PathWeigh II is open source and available at https://github.com/zurkin1/PathWeigh/tree/master/v2.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconstruction Set Test (RESET): a computationally efficient method for single sample gene set testing based on randomized reduced rank reconstruction error 95%
- Learning massive interpretable gene regulatory networks of the human brain by merging Bayesian Networks 95%
- Connectivity Measures for Signaling Pathway Topologies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- GeneSNAKE: a Python package for benchmarking and simulation of gene regulatory networks and perturbation-induced expression data 96%
- Batch-effect correction in single-cell RNA sequencing data using JIVE 95%
- ScaleSC: A superfast and scalable single cell RNA-seq data analysis pipeline powered by GPU. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.