Hybrid Health Recommender Systems for Antibiotic Prescription in Sepsis Patients: Statistical Method Development and Evaluation
Marchi, H.; Schmiegel, S.; Borgstedt, R.; Rehberg, S.; Fuchs, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatient survival in sepsis critically depends on immediate and appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy. Selecting the optimal therapy is challenging in practice due to often incomplete information and time constraints, while minimizing broad-spectrum antibiotic use is essential to prevent resistance development. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) can assist physicians in deciding on an empiric therapy. MethodsWe explore health recommender systems (HRS) as a methodological basis for such CDSS with the aim to predict the therapy response of newly diagnosed sepsis patients to all eligible therapies. Using retrospective clinical and microbiological data from a German university hospital, we introduce and evaluate four HRS of varying complexity, input information and applicability. Each system combines collaborative and demographic filtering in a hybrid manner, employing both memory- and model-based filtering techniques. The HRS make use of both patient similarity (defined by core data and laboratory values) and therapy similarity (defined by pathogen coverage). ResultsThe best results regarding precision, and F1 score are achieved by the least complex HRS (using memory-based filtering with patient similarity) and the most complex HRS (using model-based filtering and integrating patient core data and laboratory values). However, performance varies significantly across individual therapies. Memory-based methods are particularly suitable for new patients without prior therapy information if data is balanced, whereas model-based approaches perform better when therapy response is already partially available. ConclusionsWe present a methodological framework for hybrid HRS that aligns both memory-and model-based approaches with their respective optimal clinical scenarios, while underscoring the critical necessity for high-quality data to handle patient heterogeneity. While application in clinical practice is not yet feasible based on current data, our proposed approaches advance sepsis therapy research and offer a foundation for future studies. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=115 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25340749v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (27K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@65ec20org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1716286org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fb65ccorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d861b7_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal Analysis for Multivariate Integrated Clinical and Environmental Exposures Data 94%
- Addressing Label Noise for Electronic Health Records: Insights from Computer Vision for Tabular Data 94%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitigating Pathogenesis for Target Discovery and Disease Subtyping 93%
- Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize the Importance of Hematologic Biomarkers in Prognosticating Patients with Suspected Infection 92%
- BenchXAI: Comprehensive Benchmarking of Post-hoc Explainable AI Methods on Multi-Modal Biomedical Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven Discovery of Mathematical and Physical Relations in Oncology Data using Human-understandable Machine Learning 95%
- An Explainable Multi-Modal Neural Network Architecture for Predicting Epilepsy Comorbidities Based on Administrative Claims Data 92%
- Predicting Ward Transfer Mortality with Machine Learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 95%
- Graph-Based Clinical Recommender: Predicting Specialists Procedure Orders using Graph Representation Learning 94%
- A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: high-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.