Neural networks for inhibitory function and error detection in younger and older adults for early detection of cognitive decline: a comparative study
Ukai, K.; NIshimoto, K.; Ito, H.; Yamauchi, R.; Maeda, K.; Katayama, O.; Murata, S.; Morita, K.; Kodama, T.
Show abstract
Cognitive function can decline irreversibly with age, potentially progressing to dementia. Intervention during the preclinical stage is considered effective, but evaluation often requires large-scale equipment and tests. A decline in inhibitory function precedes and is involved in a general decline in higher-order brain functions, making its assessment a key target for early detection. We focused on error-related negativity (ERN) to capture the neural network of inhibitory function. While larger ERN amplitudes indicate higher error detection ability and correlate with inhibitory function, the causal relationship, mutual influences, and age-related effects in older adults remain unclear. This study measured brain activity during an inhibitory task in young and older adults to examine the neural networks related to error detection and inhibitory function. We used LORETA iCoh Full Vector Field analysis to verify directional connectivity. In the elderly group, during error responses, we observed significantly stronger beta-band directionality from the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) to the left frontal pole. Between the ventral and dorsal ACC, we also found significantly stronger directionality in the theta, alpha, and beta bands. During correct responses, they showed significantly stronger alpha and beta-band directionality from the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) to the right frontal pole. Compared to the elderly, the young group exhibited significantly stronger mutual directionality between the ventral and dorsal prefrontal cortices in the alpha and beta bands. They also showed widespread, significantly strong directionality among the ACC, bilateral DLPFC, and frontal poles. These results suggest that error detection ability is important for the normal functioning of inhibitory control in older adults. Furthermore, an age-related decline in metacognitive abilities may be associated with impaired inhibitory function. The insights from this study can contribute to developing risk prediction models for cognitive decline and establishing effective preventive strategies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of cognitive decline using a single-channel EEG with an interactive assessment tool 97%
- Regular Tai Chi Practice Is Associated with Improved Memory as well as Structural and Functional Integrity of the Hippocampal Formation in the Elderly 95%
- Role of the hippocampus during logical reasoning and belief bias in aging 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A correlational study between microstructural, macrostructural and functional age-related changes in the human visual cortex 96%
- Age-related changes in the motor planning strategy slow down motor initiation in elderly adults 95%
- Relationship between finger movement characteristics and voxel-based specific regional analysis systems for Alzheimer’s disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability and Validity of Cognitive Workload in Older Adults 96%
- Site-specific effects of online rTMS during a working memory task in healthy older adults. 92%
- Abnormal Functional Network Topology and its Dynamics during Sustained Attention Processing Significantly Implicate Post-TBI Attention Deficits in Children 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of cognitive reserve on physiological measures of cognitive workload in older adults with cognitive impairments 97%
- Greek High Phenolic Early Harvest Extra Virgin Olive Oil Reduces the Over-Excitation of Information Flow based on Dominant Coupling Model in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: An EEG Resting-State Validation Approach 94%
- Physiological pattern of cognitive aging 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.