E-field guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates oscillatory brain activity dynamics in tinnitus
Schoisswohl, S.; Langguth, B.; Neff, P.; Schecklmann, M.; Kleinjung, T.; Sadeghi Shabestari, P.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe auditory phantom sound perception tinnitus is accompanied by maladaptive neurophysiological changes. In tinnitus treatment, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is applied to counteract these pathological alterations. Previous work showed that single-session rTMS can reduce tinnitus loudness and modulate tinnitus-associated oscillatory brain activity. This study aimed to contribute to this research branch by addressing previous methodological shortcomings, including the absence of neuronavigation and adequate sham control. The objective was to assess tinnitus loudness and ongoing brain activity changes following various rTMS protocols, and to characterize modulations related to patient-specific most effective protocols, potentially uncovering electrophysiological markers of tinnitus suppression. MethodsThree active protocols (1,10,20 Hz; 200 pulses) and one sham protocol (0.1 Hz; 20 pulses) were delivered to the left and right temporo-parietal junction of 22 chronic subjective tinnitus patients using e-field-guided neuronavigation. Resting state EEG was recorded before and after each stimulation, along with tinnitus loudness ratings. Patient-specific protocols eliciting maximal suppression were identified via significant pre-to-post loudness reductions exceeding sham. ResultsRight 10 Hz rTMS induced strongest loudness suppressions. Significant and sham-superior EEG modulations were observed after right 10 Hz, right 20 Hz and left 20 Hz. Power increases in the Delta, Theta, Alpha and Gamma frequency bands were mainly observed in frontal and temporal areas but did not correlate with reported tinnitus suppression. In 16 patients it was feasible to identify a protocol inducing significant loudness reduction exceeding sham. Here suppression was associated with increased Alpha activity in the frontal cortex. ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that brief rTMS protocols can transiently suppress tinnitus and modulate tinnitus-related oscillatory brain activity dynamics. Frontal Alpha power increases might reflect local enhanced inhibitory processes and reduced tinnitus percept processing, emphasizing frontal Alpha as a candidate marker for effective tinnitus suppression.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial 90%
- Neural adaptation at stimulus onset and speed of neural processing as critical contributors to speech comprehension independent of hearing threshold or age 89%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating electric field modelling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects 92%
- Single versus Combination Treatment in Tinnitus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial 91%
- Lateral Prefrontal Theta Oscillations Causally Drive a Computational Mechanism Underlying Conflict Expectation and Adaptation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of bimodal neuromodulation for tinnitus treatment in a real-world clinical setting in United States: A retrospective chart review 92%
- Respiratory modulations of cortical excitabilityand interictal spike timing in focal epilepsy - a case report 89%
- Non-vectorial Integration of Intersectional Short-Pulse Stimulation Enables Enhanced Deep Brain Modulation and Effective Seizure Control 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.