Back

A universal buffer system for native LC-MS analysis of antibody-based therapeutics

Vosper, K. R.; Davis, B. T. V.; Saraya, J.; O'Flaherty, D. K.; Velyvis, A.; Vahidi, S.

2025-11-17 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.11.17.688837 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is a powerful analytical technique for analyzing biological macromolecules. A long-standing challenge has been applying LC-MS at physiological pH under native conditions using volatile buffers. The predominant "buffer" used, ammonium acetate (AmAc, pKa 4.75 for acetic acid and 9.25 for ammonium), does not offer sufficient buffering capacity in the physiological pH range of 7.0-7.4. To address this, we evaluated a set of fluorinated ethylamines, 2-fluoroethylamine (MFEA, pKa 8.9), 2,2-difluoroethylamine (DFEA, pKa 7.2), and 2,2,2-trifluoroethylamine (TFEA, pKa 5.5), that together provide buffering across the 4.5-9.8 pH range. We show that protein separations on strong cation- and anion-exchange resins in these volatile mobile phases perform comparably to traditional non-volatile buffers, with similar elution profiles and analyte elution ranking, albeit with slightly broader peaks. Using fully volatile gradients of pH or ionic strength, we chromatographically resolved charge variants of protein analytes such as mAbs and bovine serum albumin. For many of the eluting LC peaks, we obtained high-resolution mass spectra capable of resolving glycoforms of antibodies. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) in volatile mobile phases preserved native separation order and further resolved drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) species of the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab-vedotin. For each chromatography modality we further compare innovator and biosimilar antibodies, demonstrating the reproducibility of results in the proposed volatile compounds. Together, our results establish fluorinated ethylamines, in combination with ammonium acetate, as a universal volatile buffer system for native LC-MS, broadly applicable across major chromatographic modalities while maintaining compatibility with mass spectrometry.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.6%
2
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
7
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.2%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
13
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
14
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
15
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
16
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
17
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
21
Clinical Proteomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%