Back

Supporting the implementation of chemometrics models in bioprocess from development to commercial stage

Helleputte, T.; Cornet, T.; Kanfoud, A.; des Touches, T.; Gerkens, P.; Dumas, P.; Cardillo, A. G.; de Lannoy, G.

2025-11-17 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.11.17.688770 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Manufacturing bioproducts involves using living organisms to produce a substance of interest. Cell culture is a crucial yet highly variable step. Monitoring, predicting, or even controlling the course of this growth requires data. For multiple reasons, the perspective of developing Process Analytical Technology based on chemometrics, rather than proceeding to actual samplings from the bioreactor, is strongly appealing and could lead to full digital twins of bioreactors. This paper addresses multiple roadblocks encountered along this modeling approach: proper model performance evaluation, limited amounts of data at process development stages, up-scaling between development and commercial stages, and regulatory concerns. These challenges are addressed by combining spectrometry data and offline readouts, simple and advanced machine learning techniques, and a good knowledge of the biomanufacturing activity and constraints. This paper uses vaccine data from multiple actual products at different scales to illustrate the considered developments. Authors contributionsThibault Helleputte, Thomas Cornet, Ahmed Kanfoud, Thomas des Touches, Pascal Gerkens and Gael de Lannoy were involved in the conception and design of the study and/or the development of the study protocol. Pascal Gerkens, Patrick Dumas, Antonio Gaetano Cardillo and Gael de Lannoy participated in the acquisition of data. Thibault Helleputte, Thomas Cornet, Ahmed Kanfoud and Thomas des Touches implemented the analyses, applied them to the data, and interpreted the results. All authors were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors had full access to the data and approved the manuscript before it was submitted by the corresponding author.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.