Back

Breaking the Cost Barrier: How Quantization Enables Efficient Development and Deployment of LLMs for Public Healthcare

D'addario, A. M. V.

2025-11-19 health informatics
10.1101/2025.11.17.25340460 medRxiv
Show abstract

The clinical promise of Large Language Models (LLMs) is often unrealized due to pro-hibitive computational costs. These costs create barriers not only to deployment in patient care but also to the vital process of fine-tuning models for specialized medical tasks and local patient populations. This study investigates 4-bit quantization as a methodology to make the entire clinical AI lifecycle--from development to implementation--both financially and practically viable. We performed a cost-benefit analysis using the Gemma 3 model family on the HealthQA-BR medical benchmark. We compared the diagnostic accuracy and computational resource requirements of standard full-precision models against their 4-bit quantized counterparts during both inference (clinical use) and QLoRA-based fine-tuning (model development). Quantization enabled massive efficiency gains with a clinically negligible impact on performance. For the 12B-parameter model, we observed a mere 1.3% absolute drop in accuracy. In exchange, computational requirements were reduced by 80% for fine-tuning and 69% for inference. This translates to a more than three-fold improvement in performance per unit of computational cost, accelerating research and development cycles. 4-bit quantization is a pivotal enabling technology for clinical AI. By drastically lowering the resource barrier for model customization and deployment, it empowers medical institutions to rapidly develop and validate specialized AI tools on-site. This approach holds particular promise for large-scale public health systems like Brazils SUS and provides a viable blueprint for similar health systems worldwide to transform AI from a theoretical possibility into a practical and equitable reality in patient care.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.