Breaking the Cost Barrier: How Quantization Enables Efficient Development and Deployment of LLMs for Public Healthcare
D'addario, A. M. V.
Show abstract
The clinical promise of Large Language Models (LLMs) is often unrealized due to pro-hibitive computational costs. These costs create barriers not only to deployment in patient care but also to the vital process of fine-tuning models for specialized medical tasks and local patient populations. This study investigates 4-bit quantization as a methodology to make the entire clinical AI lifecycle--from development to implementation--both financially and practically viable. We performed a cost-benefit analysis using the Gemma 3 model family on the HealthQA-BR medical benchmark. We compared the diagnostic accuracy and computational resource requirements of standard full-precision models against their 4-bit quantized counterparts during both inference (clinical use) and QLoRA-based fine-tuning (model development). Quantization enabled massive efficiency gains with a clinically negligible impact on performance. For the 12B-parameter model, we observed a mere 1.3% absolute drop in accuracy. In exchange, computational requirements were reduced by 80% for fine-tuning and 69% for inference. This translates to a more than three-fold improvement in performance per unit of computational cost, accelerating research and development cycles. 4-bit quantization is a pivotal enabling technology for clinical AI. By drastically lowering the resource barrier for model customization and deployment, it empowers medical institutions to rapidly develop and validate specialized AI tools on-site. This approach holds particular promise for large-scale public health systems like Brazils SUS and provides a viable blueprint for similar health systems worldwide to transform AI from a theoretical possibility into a practical and equitable reality in patient care.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 94%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 94%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- One LLM is not Enough: Harnessing the Power of Ensemble Learning for Medical Question Answering 94%
- A benchmark of online COVID-19 symptom checkers 92%
- Optimal policy determination in sequential systemic and locoregional therapy of oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas: A patient-physician digital twin dyad with deep Q-learning for treatment selection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 93%
- Assisting Scalable Diagnosis Automatically via CT Images in the Combat against COVID-19 92%
- Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Medical Final Examination 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Creating a computer assisted ICD coding system: performance metric choice and use of the ICD hierarchy 94%
- Medication information extraction using local large language models 93%
- EHR-QC: A streamlined pipeline for automated electronic health records standardisation and preprocessing to predict clinical outcomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.