Back

Sun protection and skin cancer screening after childhood cancer - a report from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS)

Nigg, C.; Zarkovic, M.; Joerger, P.; Tinner, E. M. E.; Mazzara, C.; Brack, E. K.; Castle, P.; Navarini, A.; Schindera, C.; Kuehni, C. E.

2025-11-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.11.15.25340311 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChildhood cancer survivors (CCS) face elevated skin cancer risk, especially after radiotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We evaluated the prevalence and predictors of sun protection, sunburn, and physician skin examination (PSE) among CCS in Switzerland. MethodsWe surveyed CCS diagnosed <21 years and surviving [&ge;]5 years after diagnosis about sun protection, sunburns during last summer, and PSE within the last year. We retrieved cancer-related data from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry and used multivariable logistic regression, stratified by age group, to identify predictors. ResultsWe included 1,048 children (5-15 years), 572 adolescents (16-19 years), and 1,959 adults ([&ge;]20 years). Regular sun protection was reported by 89% of children, 65% of adolescents, and 77% of adults, and sunburns by 23%, 49%, and 43%. PSE prevalence among those treated with radiotherapy was 21%, 18%, and 17%, and among HSCT recipients 36%, 28%, and 28%. Radiotherapy was unrelated to sun protection and PSE, but associated with fewer sunburns (OR=0.63-0.77). HSCT recipients were more likely to have attended a PSE (OR=2.06-3.75), but not radiotherapy recipients. Across age groups, survivors born more recently were less likely to protect from sun (OR range=0.94-0.97) and more likely to report sunburn (OR=1.04-1.14). ConclusionSurvivors protect insufficiently from sun and only few who are particularly at risk for skin cancer due to their treatment history attend PSEs as recommended by the Childrens Oncology Group. Healthcare practitioners should systematically integrate yearly PSE after radiotherapy or HSCT and encourage consistent sun protection, particularly among younger generations and adolescents.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
4
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
16
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%