Back

Sun protection and skin cancer screening after childhood cancer - a report from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS)

Nigg, C.; Zarkovic, M.; Joerger, P.; Tinner, E. M. E.; Mazzara, C.; Brack, E. K.; Castle, P.; Navarini, A.; Schindera, C.; Kuehni, C. E.

2025-11-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.11.15.25340311
Show abstract

BackgroundChildhood cancer survivors (CCS) face elevated skin cancer risk, especially after radiotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We evaluated the prevalence and predictors of sun protection, sunburn, and physician skin examination (PSE) among CCS in Switzerland. MethodsWe surveyed CCS diagnosed <21 years and surviving [&ge;]5 years after diagnosis about sun protection, sunburns during last summer, and PSE within the last year. We retrieved cancer-related data from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry and used multivariable logistic regression, stratified by age group, to identify predictors. ResultsWe included 1,048 children (5-15 years), 572 adolescents (16-19 years), and 1,959 adults ([&ge;]20 years). Regular sun protection was reported by 89% of children, 65% of adolescents, and 77% of adults, and sunburns by 23%, 49%, and 43%. PSE prevalence among those treated with radiotherapy was 21%, 18%, and 17%, and among HSCT recipients 36%, 28%, and 28%. Radiotherapy was unrelated to sun protection and PSE, but associated with fewer sunburns (OR=0.63-0.77). HSCT recipients were more likely to have attended a PSE (OR=2.06-3.75), but not radiotherapy recipients. Across age groups, survivors born more recently were less likely to protect from sun (OR range=0.94-0.97) and more likely to report sunburn (OR=1.04-1.14). ConclusionSurvivors protect insufficiently from sun and only few who are particularly at risk for skin cancer due to their treatment history attend PSEs as recommended by the Childrens Oncology Group. Healthcare practitioners should systematically integrate yearly PSE after radiotherapy or HSCT and encourage consistent sun protection, particularly among younger generations and adolescents.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 47%
10.9%
3
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 0.2%
7.4%
4
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
4.4%
5
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 9%
2.8%
6
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 6%
2.8%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 56%
2.8%
8
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 12%
2.3%
10
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 37%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
11
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
12
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 11%
1.7%
13
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 35%
1.3%
15
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
16
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 19%
1.2%
17
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 7%
1.2%
19
Clinical Epigenetics
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
21
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
based on 32 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Pediatric Pulmonology
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
23
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
26
New England Journal of Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 25%
0.7%
28
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.7%