Accelerated and High-Accuracy Variant Calling on Oxford Nanopore Technologies Sequencing Data with the Sentieon DNAscope LongRead and Hybrid Pipelines
Hu, J.; Freed, D. N.; Li, Z.; Feng, H.; Chen, H.; Chen, H.
Show abstract
Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) has emerged as a clinically meaningful long-read sequencing platform, enabled by recent improvements in read accuracy and throughput. However, variant calling on ONT data remains challenging due to platform-specific error profiles, particularly indels in homopolymer regions. Here, we introduce description and comprehensive benchmarks of the Sentieon DNAscope LongRead and DNAscope Hybrid pipelines on ONT whole-genome datasets, demonstrating high accuracy and substantially reduced computational requirements across SNP, Indel, and Structural Variant detection. Benchmarked against multiple truth sets including GIAB v4.2.1, CMRG, and T2T-Q100, DNAscope LongRead reduced SNP errors by [~]50% relative to Clair3 across five reference samples and showed consistently higher accuracy in all non-long-homopolymer stratifications. Integration of ONT and Illumina short reads via DNAscope Hybrid further improved variant detection: with low depth ONT + Illumina datasets, the pipeline achieved F1 scores of 0.9992 (SNPs) and 0.9979 (Indels), outperforming alternative pipelines. In challenging benchmarks such as T2T-Q100 and CMRG genes, DS-Hybrid reduced SNP and Indel errors significantly, compared to next-best methods. For structural variants, DNAscope pipelines outperformed alternative (e.g. Sniffles2), highlighting the advantages of haplotype-resolved SV detection method. Despite its accuracy, the Sentieon software suite remains computationally efficient: complete ONT long read FASTQ-to-VCF analysis completed within [~]190 minutes on a 120-vCPU Azure instance, at costs less than $5 USD. Overall, the DNAscope LongRead and Hybrid pipelines deliver fast, accurate, and scalable germline variant calling for ONT datasets, providing a practical solution for comprehensive whole-genome analysis in both research and clinical genomics.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate Identification of Extrachromosomal Circular DNA from Long-read Sequences. 95%
- Benchmarking copy number aberrations inference tools using single-cell multi-omics datasets 93%
- DeepSSV: detecting somatic small variants in paired tumor and normal sequencing data with convolutional neural network 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery 94%
- Flexible, Production-Scale, Human Whole Genome Sequencing On A Benchtop Sequencer 93%
- Performance evaluation of structural variation detection using DNBSEQ whole-genome sequencing 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.