Back

PaNDA: Efficient Optimization of Phylogenetic Diversity in Networks

Holtgrefe, N.; van Iersel, L.; Meuwese, R.; Murakami, Y.; Schestag, J.

2026-02-25 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.11.14.688467 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phylogenetic diversity plays an important role in biodiversity, conservation, and evolutionary studies by measuring the diversity of a set of taxa based on their phylogenetic relationships. In phylogenetic trees, a subset of k taxa with maximum phylogenetic diversity can be found by a simple and efficient greedy algorithm. However, this algorithmic tractability is lost when considering phylogenetic networks, which incorporate reticulate evolutionary events such as hybridization and horizontal gene transfer. To address this challenge, we introduce PaNDA (Phylogenetic Network Diversity Algorithms), the first software package and interactive graphical user-interface for exploring, visualizing and maximizing diversity in phylogenetic networks. PaNDA includes a novel algorithm to find a subset of k taxa with maximum diversity, running in polynomial time for networks of bounded scanwidth, a measure of tree-likeness of a network that grows slower than the well-known level measure. This algorithm considers the variant of phylogenetic diversity on networks in which the branch lengths of all paths from the root to the selected taxa contribute towards their diversity. We demonstrate the scalability of this algorithm on simulated networks, successfully analyzing level-15 networks with up to 200 taxa in seconds. We also provide a proof-of-concept analysis using a phylogenetic network on Xiphophorus species, illustrating how the tool can support diversity studies based on real genomic data. The software is easily installable and freely available at https://github.com/nholtgrefe/panda. Additionally, we extend the definition of phylogenetic diversity to semi-directed phylogenetic networks, which are mixed graphs increasingly used in phylogenetic analysis to model uncertainty of the root location. We prove that finding a subset of k taxa with maximum diversity remains NP-hard on semi-directed networks, but do present a polynomial-time algorithm for networks with bounded level.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
25.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
3
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
7
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
9
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
10
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
14
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
18
Algorithms for Molecular Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
24
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%