Back

Bemnifosbuvir and remdesivir inhibit tick-borne encephalitis virus infection in complementary in vitro and ex vivo disease models

Leoni, S.; Schultz-Pernice, I.; Kratka, Z.; Eyer, L.; Freiholz, L.; Fahmi, A.; David, T.; Golomingi, A.; Blank, F.; Dejmek, M.; Grandgirard, D.; Dijkman, R.; Ruzek, D.; Alves, M. P.; Leib, S. L.

2025-11-14 microbiology
10.1101/2025.11.13.688315 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The geographical distribution and incidence of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) have steeply increased over the past decades, raising to represent a major health concern in Asia and Europe. Symptoms of TBE, caused by infections with tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), range from mild, flu-like symptoms to severe neurological disease, often accompanied by long-term sequelae persisting for several years following pathogen encounter. While effective vaccines against TBEV are available, no antiviral drugs are currently approved and therapeutic options for patients suffering from TBE are limited to supportive measures. Compounds able to disrupt viral nucleic acid synthesis bear the potential of effectively limiting viral replication and spread. Seeking to fill the therapeutic gap, we evaluated the efficacy of a panel of approved and investigational antiviral compounds in containing TBEV infection. Combining several cell lines, human neural organoids and organotypic rat brain slice cultures, we found that the nucleoside analogs remdesivir and bemnifosbuvir efficiently limit viral replication. Through infectious virus quantification, immunofluorescence analysis and flow cytometry, we report significant, dose-dependent reduction of viral loads across all models used, with inhibition observed at low doses for both drugs. Notably, while we observed bemnifosbuvir to be well tolerated, we report important cytotoxicity of remdesivir when applied to human neural organoids. Our findings identify bemnifosbuvir and remdesivir as novel treatment strategies for TBE, providing an accessible and timely response to a clinical challenge of pressing concern.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antiviral Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
3
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
4
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
17
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
20
ChemMedChem
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
23
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%